Friday, August 31, 2007

Republicans call Justice Department on aiding terrorist front groups?

Audrey Hudson hits the nail on the head again - she of "flying imam" coverage fame - in Republicans slam Islamic Society convention. Is it true that, like tonsils, Republican "manly orbs" will grow back after years of mutilation at the hands of our "politically correct" rusty knife wielding socialist leftist elites? Are Republicans actually growing their "balls" back? Have they renounced "political correctness" as the anti-American fraud that it is? Have they actually read the Twenty-Year Plan: Islam Targets America? Here is part of Hudson's news article, printed August 31, 2007: (emphasis added)
Republican lawmakers are urging the Justice Department not to participate in a convention held by the Islamic Society of North America — a group named as an unindicted co-conspirator in an ongoing terrorism-financing case. In a letter to Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales, Reps. Peter Hoekstra of Michigan, ranking member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, and Sue Myrick of North Carolina called the Justice Department's involvement a "grave mistake." "In light of the threat that our nation ... is currently facing from radical jihadists, and because of the president's commitment to fighting the war on terror on all fronts, we believe it is a grave mistake to provide legitimacy to an organization with extremist origins, leadership and a radical agenda," the lawmakers said... "It is absolute insanity for the federal government, especially the Department of Justice, to be giving any credibility at all to a group like the ISNA, which has such strong links to Islamic extremism," Mr. King said. (Rep. Peter T. King, New York Republican).... Rank-and file lawyers within the Justice Department object to participating at the ISNA convention, fearing it will undermine the case against the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development. According to an e-mail from Susana Lorenzo-Giguere, acting deputy chief of the Voting Rights Division, the plan to "co-sponsor an exhibit booth" will involve sending government lawyers to man it for the Labor Day weekend event in Illinois.
Our tax-dollars at work, giving legitimacy to those who want to destroy our culture and kill us. Don't be surprised if our Justice Department bows their heads to the ground and raises their butts in the air in servitude to the Islamic Society. After all, this is the same Justice Department that forces its FBI agents to attend "diversity" and "sensitivity" training from CAIR, another unindicted co-conspirator in the same federal case against the Holy Land Foundation, a funding cover for terrorists. Good job, Hudson! When is the last time the Justice Department sent lawyers to help man a booth for a local Baptist Association? Just curious... Fair is fair, boys. If you wanta waste my hard-earned tax money catering to the Islamist terrorist front groups, the least you could do is buy cookies from your local Baptist or Methodist bake-sale. Personally, I'd rather you spend the JD lawyers' time closing down and deporting ALL of the terrorist front groups, not aiding and abetting them.

Labels: ,

Wednesday, August 29, 2007

Racist and Segregationist Brussels - What a shame!

It is time to relocate the headquarters of NATO and anything else the US is funding in Brussels. Paul Belren has a good editorial today, Europe's jackboot progressives that's worth a look. Segregation, separatism, and Islamic intolerance is supported by every US dollar we send to Brussels. It is past time to stop that "Alice in Wonderland" upside-down nonsense. With Sharia Law instituted in Brussels and gaining more support throughout Europe, Brussels has instituted segregated public swimming pool hours for Muslim women and approved demonstrations for groups perpetrating the fraud that violent militant Muslims following the true faith as expounded in the Qur'an did not blow-up the Twin Towers, et al. Mohammed Atta must be disappointed that his packed wedding suit went for naught. The SIOE, Stop the Islamization of Europe, group cannot protest peacefully on September 11th against the institution of Islamic Law throughout Europe - law that would make even discussing Islam and its associate brutality toward its own women, beheadings, intolerance, segregation from the "host" culture, Islamic terrorism, and the like a criminal act. Why no demonstration? The mayor of Muslim Brussels says the demonstration by SIOE would incite discrimination and racism. Ho, ho, ho!!! Maybe the Muslim ladies - the ones beaten and bruised - swimming during the racist, segregationist designated swimming times in public pools will get a chuckle out of that one. Islamofascism is thriving in the heart of the former Nazi Europe and what Hitler could have only dreamed of is coming to pass in England. The "jackbooted" thugs of today cower behind the chains of "political correctness" and under the black shrouds of women enslaved in burkas but still swimming in peace. "Peace be upon them" as their husbands beat them like bred chattel - a role these women accept as their lot with slavery as their place. They may have waved their purple-tipped fingers when they voted in Iraq but they are still valued as only 1/2 a person when testifying in court. Maybe the racist American elite left is right when they say as they do about Iraqis that Muslims are just incapable of living in liberty and freedom and tolerance - you know, the same racist trype that says a black American really can't be a Republican and if he proclaims Republican values - free enterprise, smaller government, anti-socialism - he's a race-traitor. Hmmm... Once again, I leave you with this reference: Twenty-Year Plan: Islam Targets America. What will it take for Americans to wake up? Illegal aliens are already murdering over 12,000 Americans a year in America; Michael Chertoff has a "gut feeling" - good basis for fear; and the Border Patrol head honcho says the Border Patrol is only there to stop "terrorists", and our own government is not defending our nation right here at home. Yep, what will it take? And we move backward to segregation and "special" religious treatment for Muslims - those footwashing stations and prayer rooms in public schools - yep, it'll take something to knock some sense into us that Islam, although it may have a "spiritual" side is a political ideology and is right now pushing for world dominance one little prayer room at a time. You better eat up those yummy hotdogs and drink that cold beer at ball games 'cause those days are numbered. They've gotta be offensive to someone. Right?

Taxation without representation! Judicial Tyranny in Virginia...

Well, you thought we had a revolution against "taxation without representation" back in 1776 or so and we did but, judicial tyranny reigns in the Commonwealth of Virginia today as reflected in the news article, Unelected body granted power to tax for roads. Maybe it's time for another Boston Tea Party in the land of the free and the home of the brave. The Supreme Court gutted our private property rights in Kelo vs New London, Connecticut so we have the illusion of owning our own homes but only until a developer can grease the skids or line the pockets of "elected" officials to condemn our property to sell it to another private party. Pretty soon there won't be much Motherhood and apple pie to fight for, will there? So, it should come as no surprise that one lone judge in Northern Virginia has given an unelected group, the so-called Northern Virginia Transportation Authority, the "power" to raise our taxes on home sales, car safety inspections, and any place else they can find to slap on a fee or a tax. After all, the voting citizens of Northern Virginia and the Hampton Roads area voted "regional taxation authorities" DOWN with overwhelming votes of NO and we've been fighting this ever since at least 2000. One Republican governor-hopeful, Jerry Kilgore, lost largely because he supported this insanity. One Republican State Senator just lost his party's primary vote because he supported this "regional taxation" idea - former Senator Marty Williams. Republicans would rather risk the loss of the seat than have a person represent them who clearly supported the scheme the judge has upheld. So, where'd we store our feathers, war paint, and barrels of tea? Time to dig them out of the closet and dust 'em off...

Sunday, August 19, 2007

Pat Condell's Truth about Islamophobia

H/T to "anonymous" for this one. Thanks! Go see this video before it is taken down. It is GREAT! Message from Pastorius. Someone, please record the video and then transcribe it for us. It is worth the effort. Have a good Sunday!

Thursday, August 16, 2007

Newport News, VA - Stop the Violence Crusade

Angie Green of the Daily Press wrote a stirring news article, Worried residents march for peace, that brought a few questions and some not-so-politically-correct observations to my mind as I read the article. The article also brought to mind the question a friend of mine from work, a black American lady, asked me when the movie Boyz n the Hood came out on television. My friend asked me what I thought of the movie. After having watched the movie, my friend and I discussed the movie and our respective reactions to the movie. My response was candid in that I simply did not understand how citizens could or would allow their neighborhood to become over-run by gangs. Naturally, we began to focus on the black community and the white community and we both acknowledged that we could only view the situation depicted in the movie in a very "general" way - which always leads to simplification of sometimes very complex conditions. Further, Ms. Green's article called to mind James A. Michener's book, The Drifters. I was quite young when I read that book and I was startled by the dialogue between several policemen in New York City in response to a rash of gang killings taking place within a "ghetto." The consensus was that it would be too dangerous for the officers to go into the neighborhood because - similar to domestic disputes - the local citizens would turn on the officers - regardless of the officers' ethnicity - coming to quell the killings and so the killings would go on. Even in spite of innocent people being killed by the gang members, the neighborhood would "join hands" against the police and thereby protect the killers who were terrorizing the innocent neighbors - all black; the gangs and the innocents. My friend and I continued to discuss the movie and my response was essentially, I can't even identify with the innocent citizens in the "hood" because in a white community, traditionally, we just wouldn't let the gangs take over. We'd have the police on the gangs like "ducks on June bugs." We don't circle the wagons to protect the ones who terrorize us - period. We expect the police to make our streets safe; we do not align with the gangs under any circumstances and certainly not if we are the same ethnicity, meaning non-Hispanic white or Hispanic (which are whites who are Latino). Certainly there are mis-carriages of justice all across the "skin color" chart but, in my experience, white people expect the police to do the job they are paid to do, no exceptions. To step away from generalities for a moment, there is a Section 8 housing area near where I live. The citizens are of mixed ethnicities - they have a neighborhood watch that "stops crime dead in its tracks" and they don't care what color skin someone has. So why do some communities - innocent citizens - have their communities turned into "gang" havens with 22 homicides now, August 16, 2007 for the year? And other communities wage all out war against their communities being taken over? One thing could be that in the latter case, the community never lets the gangs get a foot-hold. The men in the community do their own "policing" in that they keep their neighborhood safe by letting criminals/gangs know that the community is not safe for the criminals - they can't hide behind skin-color in that given neighborhood. So why does it happen in some communities and not in others of the same general ethnicity? There was a time when the neighborhood was safe to drive through regardless of one's skin color; a friend of mine who lived in the specific neighborhood moved out decades ago because it was slowly turning into a haven for liscense for crime. Today, a white person who drives through the area in the daytime is not too bright; the same white person who drives through the area at night is a fool. From the article, "We are going to take our community back," march organizer Bishop Kendrick Turner prayed as the group held hands before the march. "We are going to stand for something." The community in question is rather large, once boasted of having a large Catholic high school, an established Jewish community with a Jewish school which students attended after attending "public" school, nice mom-and-pop stores and the area was generally integrated albeit in small sections but still with everyone living safely. What has changed? The march was brought together quickly following the slaying of a youth mentor, Leonard Carter, who was fatally shot Monday afternoon at a corner market. Why murder a man who is a mentor in the community? Why indeed? Was he bringing about change for the good? Over the decades the neighborhood has changed, people of all ethnicities who could have moved out, major stores have hestiated to locate in the area due to theft/shop-lifting that has closed other grocery stores. I saw that happen in my neighborhood when we had a grand grocery store with great produce, a fine deli counter, a wonderful bread and pastry section - Section 8 housing was built next door to the grocery store. Kids would go into the store in the summer with heavy parka-type coats on to get the "five finger" discounts. It wasn't long before our community lost the best grocery store we had ever enjoyed. I wish Bishop Turner well. The first step is that the community must set up many "neighborhood" watch groups and be ruthless in sticking together against the gang members who are terrorizing the neighborhood. The "neighborhood" watch groups must work with the police to bring the terrorizing gang members to justice, and for the sake of their community, get beyond "skin color" because for the criminals who killed Leonard Carter, skin color was certainly not an issue. In fact, I would hazard a guess that it is the very color of their skin that they safely hide behind knowing that their "skin color" has protected them and provided a cover for them against "the man." And perhaps it is their "skin color" that enables them to terrorize and victimize the elderly, the children, the moms and pops who try to make the community safe. Perhaps because of "skin color", the community has protected the gang members and the criminals - maybe it is the community that needs to step outside of that notion of "skin color" and call down the wrath of citizens, backed up by the police, who have had enough, who want to live in safety, and deserve to be able to have safe streets where folks can walk to the corner market on a cool evening, can sit on their porches, and visit in safety. A community can't cry "foul" when the police try to do their job and then castigate the very same police when crime increases. Ya can't have it both ways. Just to put this homicide rate in perspective, last year there were 11 homicides in the entire city of Newport News at this time. Today there are 22, the most recent being Leonard Carter, a mentor for the community's youth. Mr. Carter must have been making a difference; he must have been leading the youth away from crime and toward dreams fulfilled. Leonard Carter must have been quite a man - a good man who gave his life for his community. The community cannot let that murder stand; the community must take this "bull by the horns" and ensure that this violence is stopped.

Sunday, August 12, 2007

North American Union spells death of US sovereignty

The North American Union spells death to United States sovereignty. That's what all the bruhaha was about with the amnesty bill - give the illegals from Mexico anmesty and citizenship, giving them dual-citizenship and thereby grease the skids for more illegal entries, but this time the illegals from Mexico will be "legal" and if you don't speak Spanish or conform to the "new world order" you are in duck soup. The facts are simple - the elite globalists and new world order folks just want America as we know it done away with. I just came across a post from the Gates of Vienna that must not get lost. It needs to be read and re-read until it sinks in. I am linking to the post by Dymphna, here, "Yes, Virginia, There is an American Union Waiting in the Wings...", and also putting this post in my favorites list. Addendum: the following was left as a comment by "Concerned American." I think it is relevant to include the comment in full here: ~~~~~~~~ The NAU proposal is yet another step in abolishing whatever vestiges of White Western civilization are left in the USA and Canada. Not that anything like it is needed at this point. In one of your earlier posts, you pointed out that the common forecast for the USA as a White minority nation-- in 2050-- is probably too long, and you're right. More professional demographers, analyzing the current state of affairs, suggest that in fact, 2020 or 2025 is more likely as the point when US Whites become a minority here. Canada and New Zealand are in the same boat (very Socialistic immigration policies). Curiously, England-- which has never been "a nation of immigrants"-- will reach the same White minority status around the same time, since about half a million non-Whites enter in there every year while over 250,000 British Whites leave. In fact, among kids under 8 years old, Whites are already a decreasing minority. And many states overall have a White minority. Arizona, where I'm from originally, isn't recognizable anymore-- it's now a Latino state. New Mexico and California even more so. Texas and Florida are fast getting there. Then Hawaii, New York, Connecticut, even Michigan getting there very fast. Most of us from those states have resettled away from them, as far away as Wisconsin, New Hampshire, Idaho, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, Maine, Ohio, Indiana, Missouri, Nebraska and Montana. The rest are quickly following, or even moving abroad. Moreover, the USA will become majority non-White by about 2020 or 2025 *even if* we deported all the illegals, since it's not the illegal alien population that's pushing the non-White segment up so much-- it's the *legal immigrant* population, at well over 1.2 million per year and almost all of it non-White. In fact, even stopping legal immigration as well as illegal wouldn't protect us-- due to birth rate differentials and other factors, even a total cessation of all immigration and some deportation, would still result in a White minority nation by around 2035 or so. We've dug a grave already for White civilization in the United States! The weird thing is, much of the Western world has taken the opposite tack. Despite their recent problems with Turkish people (or maybe because of them), countries like Estonia, Finland, Germany, Austria, Denmark and some others in Europe have introduced very tough restrictions on non-White immigrants while expelling many of those there. In fact, they're even inviting in ethnic Whites from other countries such as those in North America, New Zealand/Oz, Chile, Brazil, South Africa and east European countries. Fellow Whites outside of Europe are free to move there, just so long as they learn and utilize German or the other relevant language whatever it may be. Even the French are moving in the same direction. And these countries are over 95% Caucasian European as it is! It annoys me that we in the USA and Canada can't do anything as remotely commonsensical, although I guess that's the problem with considering ourselves a "Proposition/Idea Nation," a "Nation of Immigrants" rather than an ethnic nation that arose organically with Europeans the indigenous population, as e.g. Germany, Finland and France see themselves. At least it's good to know there'll be *some* country on the planet that's still majority White in 50 years. Maybe I should pick up those German books from high school again, they might wind up being useful. Es scheint, das ist Zukunft hier. (Or someting along those lines.) ~~~~~~~~~~~

Labels: , ,

South Carolina "terrorist" pipe-bomber plot linked to Sami Al-Arian Investigation

From Dan at Riehl World View, SC 2 Linked to Sami Al-Arian Investigation. If you recall, Sami Al-Arian is the University of Southern Florida fella who was helping the terrorists with funding, right? It is a relief to know that the two accused Middle Eastern engineering students here on student visas now have their copies of the Koran and their prayer rugs provided by CAIR as if these would-be terrorist bombers are somehow "political" prisoners. They are political prisoners in a way but that is prisoners of what is called "political" Islam. There are just too many Islams to keep track of: we have "spiritual" Islam; we have "political" Islam; we have "societal" Islam; we have moderate Muslims; we have Islamists; we have violent Islamic terrorists; we have Wahhabism and Salafism; we have "islamofascism"; and we have Islamic fundamentalism. We are just overwhelmed with Islamisms everywhere we look. To me it's really simple: all practitioners of Islam who want to kill infidels and apostates, step forward. But wait, they are doing that... Silly, silly me! Yep, just keep on giving out those student visas to men from the Middle East and don't forget to review your copy of Twenty-Year Plan: Islam Targets America. Check off Islamist accomplishments such as making someone like Representative John Conyers the lackey to Islamist groups. Aren't we Americans too smart to let this happen or are we too divided through dis-information and a weakened, as in not well-educated, citizenry? Can your high school graduate read his diploma? Can your high school graduate write a simple cover letter to a job application?

Labels: , ,

Muslims control Brussel's City Council

In a clear majority of 10 to 8, Muslims and perhaps more being "converts" control the city council of Brussels, Stop the Islamisation of Brussels. This is the heart of the European Union. I thought Western Civilization was lost before, not how can anyone doubt it when the City Council that gives permits for demonstrations is controlled by Muslims. No anti-terrorist/anti-islamofascist group has a prayer of getting a permit for a peaceful demonstration. Keep on giving out those visas, boys and girls. And keep on importing terrorism via the growing hate-filled asylum-seekers and it'll be all over but for the rush to buy burkas... On a lighter note, terrorist cells and activities move along apace, here.

Labels: , ,

Saturday, August 11, 2007

M. Zuhdi Jasser on Fascism; CAIR functionary for Muslim Brotherhood

Dr. M. Zuhdi Jasser speaks out about the crushing hold of Fascism and the brutal impact it has on everyone in Fascism Spares No One.
When physicians were implicated in Islamist terror plots last month, many wondered how those who vowed to heal could plot to kill. FSM Contributing Editor M. Zuhdi Jasser explains how Islamists create such antithetical situations among their followers.
FBI Fingers CAIR as Part of Muslim Brotherhood's Palestine Committee
What if you learned that the mainstream media outlets have been concealing the dangerous truth about CAIR's connection to Hamas? Does this seem possible? Read what was just disclosed in court testimony today (August 9, 2007) in the Holy Land Foundation trial in Dallas, Texas.
Ah-hmm... Would this be the same CAIR that has been contracted to provide "sensitivity" training to our very own FBI? "Sensitivity" training paid for of couse with US tax dollars? In Setting Aside Political Differences for Common Goals, Frank Salvato provides us with some goals that Americans can tackle together - no matter how much our political parties and others may wish to drive us apart, we have more in common as Americans than the differences which seem to get attention.
American politics has become so caustic that many engaged in the process have become blind to the fact that there are many common goals that exist between the two factions that currently hold good government hostage. Clear thinking Americans – those not slavishly beholden to opinion polls and special interest groups – understand that the overwhelming majority of us have more in common than not. To this point it will be the wise politico that will take advantage of harnessing the energy of polar opposite groups to achieve common goals.
Salvato uses the examples of alternative energy sources and energy independence. His theory can be applied to many issues of grave concern to us today from illegal immigrants to open borders and from the inevitability (?) of the North American Union to bringing to a halt Saudi Arabia's relentless pursuit of establishing Wahhabi or Salafi Islam strongholds within the United States. Frank Salvato reveals some highly encouraging prospects for preserving our liberty by investing in the fabled inventiveness and ingenuity of our people. As Americans, we need to accept that many would tear us apart and destroy our great nation - many within and many without. Let's not let them get away with it...

Labels: , ,

Afghanistan & Pakistan could end "terrorism" within days

The following is the complete article from the Voice of America news. Please see sentence: "On Thursday, Afghan President Hamid Karzai said terrorism could be eliminated within days if Pakistan and Afghanistan work together." Okay, let's see it done, President Karzai. I'm all for it...but then with the terrorists gone, would the departure of the US dollar be far behind? Afghanistan-Pakistan Security talks continue in Kabul:
More than 600 delegates from Pakistan and Afghanistan have gathered in Kabul for a third day of talks Saturday aimed at improving border security and strengthening bilateral relations. Tribal leaders talk during a break from meetings in Kabul, Afghanistan Delegates said Friday's session of the four-day peace conference, or grand jirga, focused on specific issues dividing the two countries. Security has been tight, with thousands of well-armed soldiers patrolling the Afghan capital on concerns that Taleban insurgents may try to disrupt the assembly. Many Afghans expressed hope that the conference will help reduce violence in both countries. Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf is expected to attend the closing session on Sunday. A second conference is planned for Pakistan at a later date. On Thursday, Afghan President Hamid Karzai said terrorism could be eliminated within days if Pakistan and Afghanistan work together. Earlier this week, the Pakistani leader abruptly canceled his participation for the opening session, citing domestic problems. Pakistani Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz has been attending the conference in place of General Musharraf. Mr. Aziz said Afghan groups still have not reconciled, and that Afghanistan cannot blame others for its troubles. The governor of Pakistan's violent Northwest Frontier Province, Ali Muhammad Jan Aurkzai, said little progress on the matter can be made unless the outlawed Taleban is invited to participate in the conference.
I certainly hope Musharraf has good security of his own...

Diana West: speaking out for our freedoms

As recounted at Jihad Watch, Diana West, in West: Don't let them terrorize our freedoms, has once again spoken truth to the Islamic ideology of world domination. Using terrorism, the threat of terrorist attacks, and our own legal system, Islamists are attacking our very freedoms by trying to shut us up and intimidate us into "censoring" ourselves. Diana West delineates the tactics used against us. Also, please see Robert Spencer's speech at the Young America's Foundation. Just a few words from West's column:
At this point, I interrupt this column to apologize to all leftists settling in for a juicy tirade against the Patriot Act, wiretaps for terrorists or the sufferings of sensitive poets in residence at Guantanamo Bay. It is not the Bush administration's efforts to protect us from "terror" (more maturely known as jihad) that compromise our freedoms, but jihad itself. And the basic freedom to discuss, analyze, debate, imagine and resist jihad is now under unprecedented assault. Consider the following events...
Let me add also that "hate-speech" laws are designed to intimidate and crush our Freedom of Speech. We must fight these laws every step of the way. Remember, this is a jihad, a "holy war", against Christianity and the Western World, Islam's ruthless global war against Christianity. You can call the war whatever you like but make no mistake, this so-called "war on terror" is the result of a full-frontal Islamic attack against Christianity.

Labels: , , ,

Marines of Haditha - we stand with you!

Haditha Marines: Advocates Call Haditha Marine's Court Martial and Conviction Into Question From Papa Ray at Redneck's Revenge, "An independent full fledged investigation of Deloitte-Touche needs to be conducted into the conflicts of interest discovered here! What the heck has happend to our country? Has UCMJ justice been subcontracted or unduly influenced by those with ulterior motives?" Please read the article and support our Marines! They stand on the wall and defend us throughout every long night. We can demand that the "light of day" is shined in upon this horrible mis-carriage of justice which turns the concept of "justice" on its head. Why have these young Marines and their commanding officer not been released and sent back to their duty stations? OUR Marines were informed upon by the enemy and look what we did. Of course, supported the enemy and disgraced ourselves in the process. Semper fi!

Musharraf to meet with Afghan leaders while gunships pound Taliban

According to the news, Pakistan's Musharraf to attend Afghan Tribal meeting (Update 1), Musharraf is to meet with Afghan's president and to address the Afghan Tribal leaders. In the meantime, Gunships pound Taliban Hideouts. To me, Musharraf must be the man to "call the shots" in Pakistan. He is the man to keep nuclear weapons out of the hands of al-Qaeda terrorists or out of the hands of any terrorists including the Taliban. To put it simply, if the Taliban or al-Qaeda terrorists get control of nuclear weapons in Pakistan, then "pre-emptive" strike may take longer to say than for us to do. Today, we beat our breasts if one person is harmed as "collateral damage." Yes, a displeasing word and unfortunate, but if Pakistan's nuclear weapons fall into the hands of the Taliban or al-Qaeda, meaning Musharraf would no longer be in control, all bets are off and the United States would then simply have to destroy the nuclear weapons under terrorists' control. We simply cannot "negotiate" with Islamic terrorists who hold the world hostage with oil today (the ones spreading Wahhabism in the US) and would hold the world hostage with nuclear weapons tomorrow. So buck up; do what has to be done. Islam does not preach "do unto others as you would have done unto you." Islam preaches, "kill the infidels." The Taliban and al-Qaeda folks don't want to negotiate. If they can get nuclear weapons, they want to use them - on us - all of us - black, white, latino, Christian, Muslim, Jew, Hindu, and, yes, even Scientologists.

Labels: , , ,

Thursday, August 09, 2007

Islam's ruthless global war against Christianity

It's easy to deny that Islam has thrown the dice and decided that now is the time to overthrown the Great Satan - that would be Western Civilization generally and The United States of America, more specifically - but the following account strips away some of the veneer folded into the "war on terror" rhetoric. A "holy war" has been declared against Christianity by Islamic leaders and, in our age of computers and speed-of-now cell phones along with the PR support from Western cable news channels, the attacks are ruthless and multi-faceted. Patrick Poole wrote the following in The American Thinker: Islam's Global War against Christianity. From Poole,
From Nigeria to Indonesia, Christians are under seige in virtually every single country in the Muslim world, the victims of countless acts of discrimination, depredation, brutality, and murder that are so widespread and systematic that it can rightfully be called the new Holocaust. This time, however, the perpetrators of this Holocaust aren't wearing swastikas, but kufi skull caps and hijabs.
So I have to ask here - why are we denying these Christians the last bastion of refuge from Islamic intimidation and terrorism. Why are we opening our borders to "terrorists" who practice the "religion of peace?" Do we want to be persecuted here too or do we want to stand as the last place of refuge for these Christians embattled world-wide? The post came to me by way of Larwyn and I must include her comments as well pertaining to President Bush's intention to name a "special envoy" to the Organization of Islamic Countries (OIC). From Larwyn:
Once that "special envoy" to the OIC is named and we know where his office is - we should inundate him with e-mails, phone calls, etc with our demands... [For my part, I thought we already had an envoy to Islamic nations under the guise of our Ambassador to the United Nations. President Bush announced last week (end of June after he spoke to the Muslim Brotherhood front groups) that he will be sending a special envoy to the 57-member Organization of Islamic Countries. Hopefully, the systematic persecution of Christians and other religious minorities will be the first and primary item in the new envoy's portfolio, with the 2007 annual report of the US Commission on International Religious Freedom and State Department's Annual Report on International Religious Freedom, which name virtually every single country in the OIC for its human rights abuses and religious cleansing, as evidence for our country's concern. The fact remains that not a single Christian or Jew lives in peace in the Muslim world, and if it is truly our nation's foreign policy to spread democracy around the world, this issue is the perfect topic for us to press...
Please read Patrick Poole's post. I have been keeping this to pass on and now is the time. Thanks to Larwyn for her relentless pursuit of the news - the news the Mainstream Media does not want us to see or hear.

Labels: , ,

Dead "Ayatollah Khomeini" comments - not

Although I do often post comments from "anonymous" but very seldom, if ever, from dead Ayatollahs, at first I thought all you American Kuffars out there in the blogosphere would like to know the latest from the departed "Ayatollah Khomeini" who commented at one of my recent posts, but on second thought, perhaps not. The late "Ayatollah Khomeini" has not been raised from the dead and comments from the person using the ayatollah's name won't be quoted or posted here again. "Anonymous" comments may or may not be posted on.

Islamic terrorists & Mexican Cartels double-team USA

Well, ya gotta hand it to these boys: the Islamic terrorists and the Mexican Drug Cartel folks. They know a good thing when they see it - all a gift from the Globalists and the New World Order, open borders crowd in Washington, DC. The same folks who talk about Homeland Security. Don't you just get the full belly-laughs with these folks - from both dominate political parties! So, I'm not picking on any of them. Congressman Ed Royce, California Republican, said recent reports expose U.S. vulnerability. Memo to Congressman - Americans don't need a report to confirm what we can see along our borders. But the article by Sara A. Carter is worth reading: Hearing sought on Islamic, Mexican ties. Poor Congressman Royce, what is it they say about "not pissing into the wind". From the news article:
A ranking House Republican yesterday demanded a hearing based on recent reports that Islamic terrorists embedded in the United States are teaming with Mexican drug cartels to fund terrorism networks overseas.
Excuse me, "To fund terrorism networks overseas..." Why would they do that when there are plenty of terrorist networks to fund right here in the USA thanks to our open borders? And after your blood has simmered on that one for a second, read article by Jerry Seper about Guard troops pulled back from border, a year early. And then tell me again how the Administration is serious about Homeland Security, I mean Homeland in-Security. Only when it comes to the North American Union and flooding us with a kazillion trucks sailing along the SPP highway. Not to mention skads more "diversity" without time for assimilation... Let me get this right: Surge working in Iraq; US border wide open to terrorists! Hmm...

Labels: , , ,

Multicultualists' success - ridding land of the "hated" Whites

Two blurbs in the Washington Times of August 9, 2007 may be of interest. The news is uplifting to me because soon everything that a "victim" does can no longer be blamed on the "white man." What a relief! Diversity Adversity - Lordy, researchers just hate it when this happens, but I have to commend the report by Brookings Institute researchers who owned-up that the surge is working in Iraq...good for them:
Diversity Adversity: (Culture, et.cetera) "It has become increasingly popular to speak of racial and ethnic diversity as a civic strength. From multicultural festivals to pronouncements from political leaders, the message is the same: Our differences make us stronger. "But a massive new study...has concluded just the opposite. Harvard political scientist Robert Putnam...has found that the greater the diversity in a community, the fewer people vote and the less they volunteer, the less they give to charity and work on community projects. In the most diverse communities, neighbors trust one another about half as much as they do in the most homogeneous settings. The study...found that virtually all measures of civic health are lower inmore diverse settings. "His findings on the down-sides of diversity have also posed a challenge for Putnam, a liberal academic whose own values put him squarely in the pro-diversity camp. Suddenly finding himself the bearer of bad news, Putnam has struggled with how to present his work." Michael Jonas, a candidate for the Lighthouse Laurels of Journalistic Courage?, writing on "The downside of diversity,", Sunday (August 5, 2007) in the Boston Globe.
Fading Whites: (Inside Politics by Greg Pierce)
Fading whites Whites are now in the minority in nearly one in 10 U.S. counties, the Census Bureau reports. As of 2006, non-Hispanic whites made up less than half the population in 303 of the nation's 3,141 counties, according to figures the bureau is releasing today. Whites were a minority in 262 counties in 2000, up from 183 in 1990. The Census Bureau's report has population estimates by race and ethnicity for every county in the nation. They are the first such estimates since Hurricane Katrina hit the Gulf Coast in 2005, the Associated Press reports. The biggest changes in were in Orleans Parish, La., home to New Orleans. The share of non-Hispanic whites in Orleans Parish grew from 27 percent in 2005 to 34 percent in 2006, while the share of blacks dropped from about 68 percent to 59 percent. According to the report, Slope County, N.D., is the whitest county in the country (99.3 percent non-Hispanic white), while whites are the smallest minority in Starr County, Texas, where 2.1 percent of the population is non-Hispanic white. Many of the nation's biggest counties have long had large minority populations, but that diversity is spreading. Prince William County, Va., has seen its Hispanic population more than double since 2000, to nearly 70,000 last year. Non-Hispanic whites account for a little more than half the population, down from about two-thirds in 2000. By 2050, minorities will account for half of U.S. residents, according to Census Bureau projections.
Of course, I think whites will be in the minority sooner than 2050 and they are feeling the slings and arrows of discrimination at every turn. "Suits 'em right. Those dirty slavers." Well, not exactly - no one in America today was a slave and no one living in America today has owned slaves unless we include the Muslims who still enslave blacks today - but we aren't counting them.... Please note, white folks are no longer classified as "Caucasians" on forms, they are not "non-Hispanic white." I do have one tiny question though: Will the "hated" white people have access to the largess of the "affirmative laws" as currently manifested through the "institutionalized racism" of today or will they, as non-Hispanic whites, be forced to establish their own "civil rights" group in order to defend themselves against the racism of their fellow citizens? Hmmm.... Just a question. If you are not aware of the overt racism directed against white Americans today, don't wake up Rip Van Winkle when you turn over... Note to all the "amnesty" and "open border, new world order" crowd in Washington, DC - how much longer do you believe any of us will allow you to remain in office and in power? My guess is: NOT LONG! Americans will survive whatever you throw at us; but let me assure you, NONE of us will be voting to keep you in office. I'm hoping to see Maxine Waters - that pleasant bastion of racial equality - tossed out on her bottom when her district becomes predominately non-white Hispanic! That'll be a great day for all Americans. If you have an interest in such things, search for the Progressive Caucus, the Black Caucus, and the Hispanic Caucus. That'll give you a quick view of the power-shift now in play. Falcon_01 at Sheepdog's Blog provided the answer: Ousted for speaking English: Floridian now national focus. So, the United States Supreme Court has destroyed private property rights and now a businessman speaking English-only has been evicted from his shop in a strip-mall because he only speaks English. Yep, thanks for the "love", you multicultural, equal-protection for illegals, folks.

Labels: , ,

Pakistan - at state of emergency; Obama causing problems

At a time in our world, inflamatory comments about other nations stayed within our borders and ended where our borders began. With the internet and 24/7 "news" coverage, we no longer have that luxury and what hypothicially responsible "would-be" say does not stop at our borders but is used to inflame already tense situations in the nations of our allies. I heard someone say this and it appears true, "Obama sits down for tea with our enemies and threatens to bomb our allies..." I am not about to suggest that Barack Obama or his "words" are even significant enough to cause a "state of emergency" in Pakistan but he should be prudent enough to keep quiet when it comes to bombing our allies. As we read in The Idependent", Pakistan 'could declare state of emergency', AP Published: 09 August 2007 A state of emergency could be declared in Pakistan because of "external and internal threats" and deteriorating law and order in the volatile north-west near the Afghan border, its government said today. Tariq Azim, minister of state for information, said some sentiment coming from the United States, including from Democratic presidential hopeful Barak Obama, over the possibility of US military action against al Qaida in Pakistan "has started alarm bells ringing and has upset the Pakistani public." But it appeared the motivation for an emergency declaration would be the domestic political woes of embattled Pakistani President Gen. Pervez Musharraf, a key ally in the US war on terrorism who took power in a 1999 coup... ~~~~~~~~~~~~ Note to Tariq Azim, tell the Pakistani people, the US military will not be taking any action in Western Pakistan unless Musharraf asks for help. Of course, Obama's words are only being used as part of the excuse - even with his "immaturity", he should certainly know not to make himself a foil, unless his reckless speech was to destabilize Pakistan further and then blame Bush for it - Bush is responsible for everything that is "the cause of the day", even global warming so why not pile on and blame him for Pakistan's problems too. But Baby Obama should show a bit more "statesmanship"...

Labels: , ,

Najistani - on Female Mutilation

Today, I received a comment from Najistani. You might find her comments of interest. This is not for the faint at heart so don't go to the picture - being a bit faint, I'll just leave the url and let you venture at your own risk. ~~~~~~~~~~ najistani said... A gruesome, bloody and sickening photo at The Green Arrow, , shows female genital mutilation in progress. The little girl has just had her clitoris and surrounding tissues cut away. However, this hasn't been done by the local Islamic witch-doctor using a rusty knife or scissors. The procedure is being carried out under clinical conditions. This means that the girl is probably anesthetised rather than being forceably held down, and will be less subject to the risk of infection. But it raises some very disturbing questions. A surgical team, presumably consisting of 'educated' doctors and surgeons who have sworn the Hippocratic oath to 'do no harm', are mutilating a child in a clinic somewhere in Dar al-Islam (one hopes this procedure is still illegal throughout Dar al-Harb). No doubt they are being paid a hefty fee for this work. Taken together with the recent 'Doctors of Death', we need to ask ourselves whether we really want 'medical professionals' of this caliber in our country. ~~~~~~~~~~~

Wednesday, August 08, 2007

Musharraf - Pakistan's military taking war to al-Qaeda

From The Star, Pakistan forces attack two militant bases:
Assault comes amid increasing U.S. pressure for crackdown in tribal lands on Afghan border Aug 08, 2007 04:30 AM Bashirullah Khan Associated Press MIRAN SHAH, Pakistan–Government forces attacked two militant bases with helicopter gunships and artillery yesterday in some of the army's toughest action in the lawless Afghan border region since militant attacks began surging last month. Maj. Gen. Waheed Arshad said troops targeted a pair of compounds in Daygan, a village about 15 kilometres west of North Waziristan's main town of Miran Shah. Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf, a key ally of the United States in its war on terror, is under rising pressure from Washington to crack down on militants based in the tribal area. He told American Senator Richard Durbin in a meeting yesterday in Karachi that comments by senior U.S. officials and would-be presidential candidates about the possibility of unilateral U.S. strikes within the country were "counterproductive and that Pakistan remained resolved to fight terrorism," the foreign ministry said in a statement. "He emphasized that only Pakistan's security forces, which were fully capable of dealing with any situation, would take counterterrorism action inside Pakistani territory," the ministry said.
I'm with Musharraf. He can deal with the violent Islamic terrorists within Pakistan and along the Afghan border. Now when they cross-over into Afghanistan, then their little "terrorist selves" are OURS! And Obama, that would-be presidential canidate would be "you!" demonstrating gravitas...

Labels: , , ,

The Lighthouse - Laurels for Journalistic Courage!

From Cassandra at The Lighthouse, we have the first of what may become many, if Western Civilization is to be saved, Laurels for Journalist Courage.
It therefore stands out like a honest newspaper in Oceania when a bread-and-butter news site like the Irish Independent is publishing a reality-based report on the encroaching Islamization that is taking the West by stealth. In the article, "Forget lily-livered liberalism, time to take stand and say we don't want Muslim immigrants", the Independent is indeed doing just that - Hat tip Foehammer's Anvil Therefore belatedly (the article is dated 17th July) these pages are awarding the first "Lighthouse Laurels for Journalistic Courage" to the "Independent" of Ireland!
Bravo to the Independent and to Kevin Myers. Here is the beginning of his commentary:
LET me ask you something. Is it a rational decision for a secular-Christian society to admit thousands of Muslims into its midst? Comparable movements of Christians into Muslim societies are not permitted, so what essential, non-negotiable, mutually respected right is involved? The question is especially apposite, because we now know the consequences for every single European society which has admitted large numbers of Muslims: social alienation, religious antagonism and outright terrorism. We know this. We all know it. And yet we continue to allow Muslim immigration. Why? What do we gain from it?
I am adding the news source to my list. Years back I read a great book, How the Irish Saved Civilization!, full title: How the Irish Saved Civilization: The Untold Story of Ireland's Heroic Role from the Fall of Rome to the Rise of Medieval Europe. Maybe they will do it again. Someone has to! Do you of Western Civilization and Culture want to see the star and crescent atop Notre Dame, or Westminster Abbey in shambles? Not on our watch...unless WE let it happen. As the new Pope Benedict asked, where is the reciprocity? Where are the Christian churches being built in Saudi Arabia. As I said in so many words but not as bravely as Kevin Myers, We do not need Muslim immigration into Western nations. We do not need to import terrorism and, while I would not suggest that all Iraqis are "terrorists", they did vote for Sharia Law to be the "Law of the Land" in Iraq. Their choice for Iraq; not my choice for America. I am just as opposed to that as I am to the North American Union and from where I sit, I can't figure out why we are importing "a revolutionary" culture from the South and "Islamic Imperialism" from around the world that has at the very least condoned over 9,000 acts of terrorism world-wide since September 11, 2001. It makes no sense. But then that is the ploy perhaps of the Globalists and the Far-Liberal Left - to throw everything off-balance so that nothing makes sense; the importation of more "diverse" factions; there is no ordered world; all mores are equivalent; and when we scream for common sense, they slap us with more restrictions and turn around and say, "You wanted more security...but we'll take your freedoms for it and we'll saddle you with taxes to enslave you. And we'll increase our dependency-based voter block to ensure our own supremacy." My question is who will be left when the dust settles after the imported "diverse warring factions" have started to claim territory in a serious way right here in the USA? And what will be left of our U.S. Constitution once the "hate-speech" and "hate-crimes" folks finish chipping away at it? I don't see how our "secular laws" can hold us together much longer, frankly - not with the seeming racism of groups such as La Raza on one side and perhaps the litigious CAIR on the other calling itself the Muslim civil-rights group. I just don't know when or what will be the catalyst that will bring this "gathering storm" to the fore. Do you?

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, August 07, 2007

Beslan and Islamic child-rapes?

A commenter left this comment at a post here just yesterday. I have included the links in addition to the urls the writer left and I am placing the writer's views here for you to read. Comments often get lost or seen by few and - in view of our general denial over the "holy war" that has been called for against us and which is now being implemented against us through many venues - including "lawsuits", the writer's comments follow. [In future, when one leaves an anonymous comment, please leave your name or how I can reach you. I will edit out that info if you like. Thank you.]
TELL THE TRUTH ABOUT BESLAN AND THE ISLAMIC CHILD-RAPES No doubt as the third anniversary approaches, the MSM will use all the old terminology - 'separatists', 'hostage-takers' , 'activists', 'freedom-fighters', 'youths' etc. No mention of the I-word nor the M-word. Al-Beeb didn't even call them terrorists. It was just a little local dispute between neighbours. Nothing to do with the Religion of Peace. However, according to Wikipedia, Beslan school hostage crisis, our Saudi friends and allies may not have been unaware of this razzia: "Arab and alleged al-Qaeda involvement Shortly after September 3, 2004, official Russian sources stated that the attackers were part of an international group led by Shamil Basayev that included a number of Arabs with connections to al-Qaeda, and said they picked up phone calls in Arabic from the Beslan school to Saudi Arabia and another undisclosed Middle Eastern country.[44] At least two English/Algerians are among the identified terrorists partaking actively in the attack: Osman Larussi and Yacine Benalia. A third, UK citizen Kamel Rabat Bouralha, arrested while trying to leave Russia immediately following the attack, is suspected to be a key organizer. All three were linked to the Finsbury Park Mosque of north London.[45][46] Russia also claimed that alleged al-Qaeda agent Abu Omar al-Saif was responsible for financing the attack." More info: "The media in the United States have been oddly fastidious in failing to report one aspect of last week’s horror in Beslan: that several Russian girls were raped by Muslim terrorists in front of their parents and classmates. ..... The behavior of Chechen terrorists in Beslan, disgusting in every gory detail by the standards of civilized humanity, was justified by the tenets of Islam and by the personal example of the cult’s inventor, Muhammad. " From Rapes in Beslan: in Muhammed's Footsteps See also: "THE full horror of the Russian school atrocity began to emerge yesterday as traumatised children told horrific tales of stabbed babies and brutal rapes. " From Beslan: They knifed babies, they raped girls As well as being raped, the children were also forced to drink their own urine. These are classic Islamic practices of 'humiliating' the Kuffar till they 'feel themselves subdued' as demanded by the Koran (Sura 9:29). The blogosphere needs to set the record straight on this atrocity. The petrodollar-bribed MSM never will. And there isn't a snowball's chance in Mohammed's final abode that anyone would even consider whether schools in America and Europe might be at risk from a repeat performance. That would be just too Separatistophobic.
I have no comment here except to suggest that readers check the links or search the urls for themselves. But are our school children at risk, well, to me, yes... Thank you... You can read and decide for yourself.

Labels: , ,

Monday, August 06, 2007

Republican Party hijacked by the "new world order" folks?

The following post was filed by Mickey over at Blue Collar Republican, The Self Destruction of the Republican Party. I have included it here in full. It deserves a good look. (emphasis added)
The Republican Party is being destroyed, but not by the ‘far Religious Right’. It is in disarray because of the moderates and the Neo-Conservatives who run it. The moderates have done nothing but sit on the fence (go along to get along). They are useless. The NeoCons have taken over the party. Their leaders have ‘exported’ Democracy by championing America meddling in the rest of the world’s affairs, they oppose isolationism, and they believe in the New Deal (socialistic big government). The Republican Party of today is the Liberal Democratic Party of yesterday: Bush has increased the national debt, Clinton increased the national debt. Bush fights Un-Constitutional wars, Clinton fought Un-Constitutional wars. Bush is providing more national health care, Clinton wanted more national health care. Clinton wanted more and bigger government and gave us NAFTA. Bush wants more and bigger government and gave us CAFTA, Homeland Security and the failed Leave No Child Behind. The ‘far Religious Right’ will soon learn there is only one Party. The Socialist party. Perhaps they will wake up and come to the Constitution Party, here.
Some of those of us who are conservatives have heretofore had no place to go but the Republican Party - that is where I am active now but as readers know I am no fan of "globalism" and "open-borders" or amnesty/citizenship for people who spit on our laws as they litter our land and destroy our rivers invading our nation. Forgive a bit of digression here but I really don't like hearing 911 calls in a language other than English and those calls having to be answered by a dispatcher in other than English. I don't like our Emergency Rooms over-run by illegals and foreign-language speakers who demand interpreters or the hospital gets sued. That's not a "diverse" America; that's a dysfunctional America. As history proves, a people are most vulnerable when they do not speak the same language. A common language lends itself to at least a unified citizenry - I don't mean we march to the same "political" drumbeats but at least we can disagree in the same language. As I recall from reading of our nation's founding that the Founding Fathers, most notably George Washington along with others, did not believe that America should involve itself in "wars" within any given nation. Rather, they supported the view that a nation's internal strife was within the province of that nation's people to work out. They also supported the notion that America could engage in trade as she saw fit - but certainly they would view our out-sourcing of jobs, our taxes that punish business and consumers alike, and other issues such as the North American Union designed under the rubric of "free trade" to be anything but good for the sovereignty of the United States of America or its citizens. I believe the Founding Fathers would be aghast at the "new world order" crowd and even more astonished with the notion that it is our "national destiny" to spread democracy around the world because "democracies don't have wars with each other." Mexico's feet-on-the-ground invasion of the US could call that notion into question - because we are being invaded and just as dangerously as a uniformed army with its conquering forces would be. Only difference is that our government would be fighting back instead of rolling over with its four paws in the air in a total act of "submission." In my view, globalism/new world order and using our "military to spread democracy" abroad while failing to defend our democratic republic at home is probably not what the Founding Fathers had in mind. Jefferson sent our Marines to Tripoli, not to spread democracy, but to protect and defend our sailors who were being kidnapped and killed by Muslims of the time, to defend our ships and our trading interests. Jefferson's was a far different mission than that of using our military to spread democracy. Current incidents demonstrate the an infiltrating jihadi force under the cover of "multiculturalism" can be more effective in weakening and undermining a nation. Melanie Phillips' Londonistan is quite clear on the effectiveness of a jihadist force in spreading chaos. In Election 2008, we need to scrutinize the candidates on their view of our role in the world. We can't afford to be "fooled" through this NAFTA and CAFTA cant. Ross was right about that "great sucking sound."

Labels: , ,

Sunday, August 05, 2007

Lindsey Gramnesty not enough; now "terrorists" in South Carolina?

Lord love South Carolinians - if having the once-promising Lindsey Graham, a.k.a. Lindsey Gramnesty, trying to shovel more illegal aliens down their throats, now they may have two Middle Eastern engineering students as "wanna be" terrorists on their hands. From "Reihl Worldview", late breaking news: Two Middle Eastern Men with explosives in South Carolina. North Carolina just has its "my SUV made me do it" Middle Eastern student driving into a student coffee shop and now South Carolina sees that bet and raises it by two. And our government is inviting more and more Saudi male students in by the 747 full. Mercy!

CAIR: moderate or bully in the school yard?

A must-see video from Hot Air: The Speech that CAIR didn't want you to see. This is the "must-see" speech given by Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch at the Young America's Foundation meeting in Washington, D.C. The speech is replete with quotations by Senators about the ties between some of CAIR's members and terrorist organizations. Spencer asks CAIR to stop their threats of law suits and intimidation, and to engage in honest, genuine debate about concerns that Americans of all faiths, including those who practice the personal spiritual aspects of Islam, about the political and societal ideologies of Islam that are used by jihadists to give license their terrorist attacks and hatred of "infidels". Spencer's request is genuine and it is one that needs to be entered into. To paraphrase, "moderate" practitioners of "spiritual" Islam need to engage the Islamists and the former must seek to reform Islam so that it can be a "peaceful" religion, not be viewed as it is seen now as a true threat to Western Civilization. Spencer asks CAIR to step up to the plate and prove through its actions and behavior that it is an organization that does not seek to intimidate Americans into silence but, itself wants - as it says it wants - open dialogue about Islam. The threats help no one and only hurt all of us. Threats and intimidation will not win, not in the long run. American will not fall under Sharia Law and the Qur'an will not become the "law of the land" as two Islamic leaders in America have stated they would like to see happen. The more Americans are threatened, the harder they will push back and the more vocal they will become. The more moderate Muslims who practice "spiritual" Islam see they communities fall prey to Islamists and their mosques turned into radical Islamic havens, the more they will fight back - if they have caught the "I'm an American" bug. For now, I'm going to bet on the moderate Muslims but they have to make their voices heard. Right now most of America is getting the wrong side of the story...if they are paying attention at all.

Barack Obama "burned" in effigy in Pakistan

From Fox News, we see that the United States is under fire in Pakistan. Fellas, "we" didn't do it! Obama did, all by himself. Give the rest of us a break, okay? On the other hand, are the Pakistanis committing a "hate-crime"?

Asylum Seekers - Do we need to do this to ourselves?

From the Telegraph, Hunt for 16 escaped asylum seekers. My question: Do we need to do this to ourselves? Do we need to inflict upon our citizens anymore people from a 7th Century "culture" who simply live by different standards of interpersonal relations with others and with regard to the "law"?
Superintendent Robin Rickard, of Thames Valley Police, said: "We are working with GEO to ensure everything is done, as quickly as possible, to locate the missing detainees. "However, I would ask that if members of the public see anyone acting suspiciously and believes they may have been involved in this incident; contact the police immediately." Officers are searching using dogs and a helicopter to track the escaped men.
I read once that Britain and France as well, for that matter, pulled out of their respective "colonies" in Africa way too soon. Why? Because the "rule of law" and the parliamentary process of elections and generating legislation as the means to "reform", not reform at the end of a gun or the use of a machete, had not been instituted long enough to "take hold". Is that racist? I don't believe so. We see what has happened to Zimbabwe under Mugabe. Not a pretty sight by any standard with white farmers killed or forced to flee and black citizens now without jobs and starving all because of Mugabe. It is known that divergent cultures cannot occupy the same land-mass without one giving way to the other. Western civilization took centuries of evolution to reach a semblance of the "rule of secular law" and that all men are to receive "equal protection" under the law. True, we are moving away from that today in the United States with white people and white Christians being persecuted covertly or overtly but the theory holds. What are we thinking? Certainly not about our children's future - the future of American white and black children for whom so many marched - white and black side-by-side... Perhaps history is doomed to repeat itself but we don't have to help it along. Do we?

USA: Islamic terrorists imported or "home grown" just for you

With the continued open borders and with the Democrats interesting behavior on the FISA "vote" that wasn't a "vote", and now the possibility of Iraqi refugees, courtesy of the Democrats, we could be getting closer to the manifestation of Michael Chertoff's "gut feeling". As in: Suicide attack in Pakistan: 20 killed or similar to the "suicide bombers" in Israel - just change the headline to something like "Muslim driver plows SUV into student-frequented coffee shop in North Carolina." And with President Bush's Administration all for "globalist - one world order" dictates lending possible support to HR 2265 and S 1651, we could expect "suicide bombings" and random acts of street-killings such as are everyday occurrences in Iraq and Pakistan, right here at home. Lovely! As reported at Atlas Shrugs, in Media ignore Black Muslim murder of their own, we already know there is a double-standard. If you are white, you get the "rusty sword"; if you are a Black Muslim, you can kill with impunity - at least if you live in California and name your bakery, Your Black Muslim Bakery. How would that be if some poor fellow named his bakery, The White Cross Buns Bakery? Yep, one man's "diversity" (code for institutionalized racism against whites) and "multiculturalism" is another man's unequal protection before the law. Heard much on the murders of Jennifer Hawke-Petit and her daughters lately? Of course not, she was a Christian; she had white skin, as did her daughters; and their torturers and killers are white. I don't know about you but "racist" is a term being used quite dishonestly against "white" people in America today. The racists are the "victims" who spit on us, attacked the 4 or 5 young white girls who went to a Halloween event last year in LA. The black attackers got 60 days "house arrest" for seriously injuring the young girls. Why were the girls attacked? They are white. Why was the "punishment" so light? The attackers were black. Can anyone say O.J. Simpson? How about Nicole Brown Simpson or Ron Goldman? Seeing a pattern here? So, when Chertoff gets that "gut feeling", it's probably his way of saying there's not enough Pepto to let him sleep at night. No wonder the poor man is so thin... He has a lot on his mind, no doubt. But will our government have our blood on its hands? "They have to be right only one time and we have to be right 100% of the time" just nolonger works for me when our government, State Department, et al including the Dems in Congress are working to import as many Muslim terrorists or would-be Islamic terrorists as possible.

Saturday, August 04, 2007

HR 2265 and S. 1651 = US Defeat in Iraq

Alert: H.R. 2265 and S. 1651 are the latest Democrat effort to bring our men and women home in defeat. The ploy - granting asylum to Iraqi refugees. That's right. It isn't as though we don't have enough "illegal" aliens of all stripes that are clogging our prisons, killing us, etc; now the Democrats want to flood the nation with Iraqi refugees. In a must-read analysis, D.K. Shideler of the Center for Vigilant Freedom has provided a look into HR 2265: to provide special immigrant status for certain Iraqis, to assist Iraqi refugees, and for other purposes. "For other purposes" - that's the part I always like in a job description. Both HR 2265 and S 1651 (sponsored by Teddy "I'm glad I know how to swim" Kennedy) are designed to destroy and undercut the laws that protect us from terrorists entering the United States. We are fighting in Iraq to "fight the terrorists" there, not here. Enactment of this legislation will open the floodgates to Iraqi refugees, signaling that we "surrender" to al-Qaeda. And this legislation puts us at further risk by weakening our asylum laws, placing us in the jeopardy that England now finds herself in. Contact your Representative and your Senators to STOP this legislation. [See sidebar for contact information] Thank you! America simply cannot import Iraqi refugees! Iraqis must stay and fight for the chance of freedom that our military men and women are fighting to give them. HR 2265 and S.1651 are the "white flag of surrender" to al-Qaeda. Make no mistake. Democrats are hungering to "create" another Vietnam. Stop them from bringing our fine military home in defeat. Do you want our military coming home in defeat as the Israelis did recently from Lebanon - with their heads bowed. Hell, no! Let's give General Petraeus and our men and women a chance to get the job done. And for our part, let's stop this legislation.

Labels: , , ,

Are "hate-crimes" laws unconstitutional?

I was just reading an article in the Washington Times by Seth McLaughlin, Second court bars Virginia fee. And I read the following several sentences which got me to thinking.
Mr. Price's attorneys argued that the abuser fees violated the equal-protection clauses of the Constitution because Mr. Price would not have faced the additional fee if he were from out of state. The decisions appear to be the first of their kind. The Washington Times earlier this week reported that officials in four other states with similar laws were not aware of any equal-protection challenges against singling out in-state drivers.
Are "hate-crimes" and "hate-speech" laws, by their very nature and intent of making the "group de jour" more protected than others, unconstitutional under the equal protection clauses (Amendment 14, Section 1) of the U.S. Constitution?

Labels: , ,

Multiculturalism and the death of a nation

From Pamela at Atlas Shrugs, we find startling FBI statistics we cannot afford to ignore: I ask you, is this what we voted for? Actual title is: The Fifth Column Party: The fix is in for their Voting Bloc. Scroll down to the INS/FBI statistics on Undocumented Immigrants also found at INS/FBI Statistical Report on Undocumented Immigrants 2006 (First Quarter). And is that isn't enough to have you stark-screaming furious, check out Illegal Immigration - Crime:
Illegal Immigration - Crime Statistics point to significantly higher crime rates in the illegal immigrant population. Document forgery, identity theft, and illegal use of stolen Social Security Numbers are nearly universal among illegals. But consider this data regarding hard crime: In Los Angeles, 95 percent of all outstanding warrants for homicide (which total 1,200 to 1,500) target illegal aliens. Up to two-thirds of all fugitive felony warrants (17,000) are for illegal aliens. Illegals kill 9,000 people annually According to US Representative Steve King (R-IA), illegal aliens commit 12 murders every day in the U.S. and kill another 13 daily through drunk driving incidents. That's more than 9,000 people killed every year by illegal aliens. As World Net Daily's Joseph Farah points out, that means more people are murdered by illegal aliens in one year than have been killed in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars since their inception. Rep. King also notes that on average eight children are sexually abused by illegal aliens every day -- that's over 2,920 annually. And that's just a small portion of the illegal alien crime wave. 4.1 million crimes committed by illegal aliens As reported in Grassfire's booklet, "The Truth About The Illegal Invasion," some 325,000 criminal illegal aliens will be incarcerated in state and federal prisons this fiscal year. A GAO study found that illegal aliens commit, on average, 12.6 criminal offenses. This means incarcerated illegal aliens have committed over 4.1 million crimes -- and that does not include illegal alien criminals who are not incarcerated. And we learned from Rep. Tom Tancredo that thousands of illegals are coming from terrorist and suspect nations.
Thanks, Pamela, for the info and for the valuable links.

Labels: , ,

Islamic terrorists, evil spawn of Globalists and Theocracy?

Last night I ranted a bit about "multiculturalism" and how the concept has been put into practice for decades to erode and reduce the planet to a globe without nations in Multiculturalism, infectious globalism now pandemic!. The consequences of breaking down Western Civilization and destroying weaker developing nations are becoming more apparent daily with the chaos and confusion along with the feeling of defenselessness as citizens watch their governments, once the bastions of national sovereignty, actively work to introduce hoards of people from very divergent cultures into once stabilized nations. For Globalists and the One World Order crowd, the League of Nations was a failure but then too is the United Nations in being the panacea to cure all ills. The hypocrisy of the United Nations is chronicled in a myriad of places, not the least of which is Screw the UN and books such as The Tower of Babble: How the United Nations has fueled Global Chaos by Dore Gold. A biography of Dore Gore can be found here. For an interview with Gold on Saudi Arabia's funding and providing safe refuge for al-Qaeda, the following may be of interest, The War on America is not over". So the answer, tear the nations down from within through "multiculturalism" and then censor all honest discussion through "political correctness." My simple question in this post is this: Is Islamic terrorism an unintended consequence of the globalists effort at "world" dominance? Has "multiculturalism" - with the help of American and European liberal Socialists - become the effective and efficient method of spreading Islamic terrorism? Many of us have written about the clash of "cultures" and the current Islamic push for Islamic domination as being one more battle in the centuries-old war between Christianity and Islam. I believe that is still true at the ground level; the soldier-to-soldier level. But is the reality more sinister than that? I have to wonder if Globalists - along with their Leftist Socialists - intended to give birth to violent Islamic terrorism or was it somehow an "accident" of conception that, with the advent of "multiculturalism" and the establishing of Islamic beach heads in Western nations, the physical world leaders of Islam saw their chance to move into the destabilized nations of the West? Western leaders are begging for them to migrate, so why not oblige? We thought we had "defeated" Communism; we believe in national sovereignty. The Globalists seem to believe that all the world should be "third world" and powerful nations brought to heel. The Socialists seem to believe that my hard-earned dollars belong to them to give to their "beggar-based constituency" (coined by Rush Limbaugh I believe). The Globalists depend on people being able to "buy" things to keep the Globalists power in place. The Socialists seem to believe in reducing us all to submission. For purposes of this post, I see the Globalists and Socialists as one, just perhaps with different methods toward reaching their respective end of world domination. And along comes the 7th Century blushing bride - Islamic Theocracy which believes that its "physical leaders" are destined to rule the world. A marriage frought with all manner of consequences. But before the honeymoon, whoops, their bastards - Islamic terrorists - blinked their eyes in this "brave new world" of "one world order" and said, "Yowsah! This multiculturalism was made for us. We can hide anywhere and cry that we are victims. That'll work." Are violent Islamic terrorists the intended spawn of the "one world order" crowd to keep us off balance and to enable them to chain us in the world of "Real ID" cards, microchips in the butt, or are the violent Islamic terrorists just an accident that needs to be aborted before the grand designs of the Globalists go up in smoke?

Labels: , , ,

Friday, August 03, 2007

Heathrow passengers abused under crushing restrictions and poor service

Terminal decline: Our airports would shame the Third world so writes Max Hastings of Heathrow Airport in London. That is a shame. Several years ago - BT (before the Islamic terrorists) circa 1990s when all we had to worry about was the IRA setting off a bomb here or there - England was a beautiful place to visit. When flying is now cruel and unusual punishment - inflicted upon us by Islamic terrorists - I just want to scream, "Kick 'em in the groin and make 'em hurt - bad, really bad!"

Hot Air Exclusive: YAF leader jason Mattera with Robert Spencer

On the ball and in the Hot Air: an exclusive, Hot Air Exclusive: jason Mattera and Robert Spencer discuss CAIR's threat against YAF. Way too short but perfect in every way! Intimidation bites someone on the bottom - guess who? The big bad bully in the playground!

Labels: , , ,

Multiculturalism, infectious globalism now pandemic!

A post at the Gates of Vienna, The EU and Globalist Alliance, led to a late-evening rant... Far more deadly than a speeding train or even conventional weapons, the mantra of "multiculturalism" has become the chant to stop discussion of issues that effect and alter the cohesion of a nation's people beyond repair; a mantra couched as "diversity" and how that is really good for a nation. Multiculturalism is designed to weaken all strong nations and destroy completely the weaker ones. Problem - the CDC has no antidote but then how could they? And of course in America, if one even wants to discuss "multiculturalism" and adverse effects it may be having due to cultures not "assimilating" into our "American" culture, one is called a racist. In America that is absurd in that we are so diverse. However, true, racist hate-groups that call themselves "The Race" are immune to a scrutiny of their agenda. Because, whoops, that scrutiny would be "racist". There is just one tad of perspective that seems to have been left out of the equation in this multicultural panacea of "globalism": Islam. [music to Darth Vador in the background.] We are told, or at least I have read, that Muslims belong to Islam and have no loyalties to any physical, bordered nation, but rather are only loyal to Islam - as dictated and interpreted by which mullah or ayatollah is in charge. If that is true, then it follows that once the "globalists" finish destroying Western Civilization and weakening smaller nations totally, the only "nation" that will remain standing is Islam - a political, societal ideology that encompasses and rigidly controls an individual's life from cradle to grave, stripping away any chance at the freedoms we in the West hold dear. An ideology that controls through beheadings, honour killings, severing of hands for infractions, and even letting young school girls burn to death in a school fire; an ideology that has no mercy or compassion for its own followers and exhorts them to kill - certainly not assimilate with - infidels. Infidels are not restricted just to non-Muslims. Some Muslims have been targeted as well for not being "muslim" enough. That notion strikes me as "funny" because I listened to an interview with a baseball star who is black saying that another player was not "black enough" because the other player is 1/2 black and 1/2 white. Can't continue to have this "race card" thing both ways. It seems that, like it or not, we are not only fighting Islamofascism but our own "home-grown" globalists as well. Not good. The following is from the Gates of Vienna and posted under the title, The EU and Globalist Alliance: (emphasis added)
Here is an interesting comment about Multiculturalism posted at a website in, of all places, Bangladesh: “Multiculturalism is an unnatural and unhealthy condition that can only afflict countries in national decline. (…) Greed and corruption will characterise the government coupled with oppressive measures directed against its citizens. Lies and deceit will be the stock and trade of media, politicians, and educational institutions.” Multiculturalism “is used to prevent a national consensus among the electorate. It erodes values, cultures, beliefs, religions, ethnic habits, etc. ensuring a swirling river of discontent upon which the multiculturalists rides. It is a perfect method of ensuring that there can never be accord, unity, or a commonly shared destiny among those ruled.” In other words: Multiculturalism is simply a tool for divide and conquer. Is there then any point in trying to comprehend its logic at all? Maybe it was just a convenient excuse used for disrupting the established order of nation states by flooding them with mass immigration under the cover of “cultural diversity” or historical inevitability. If that is the case, there never was any coherent logic behind it, so we shouldn’t waste our time looking for one. Many of those promulgating it never believed a word of it themselves. Multiculturalism is the new Allah: Don’t understand, just obey. This was undertaken by a coalition of different groups with a shared goal of undermining Western nation states. I heard supporters of mass immigration a generation ago state that all this talk about how it would change our societies into the unrecognizable was scare-mongering and racism. Now, the same groups are saying that yes, our societies have been changed forever. It’s good, and it’s anyway too late to do anything about it, so get used to it! Their propaganda was used to deceive the public and keep it off balance in order to implement potentially irreversible changes with little real debate. They knew they would never get the permission to destroy their own countries, so they simply didn’t ask. [I am tossing the idea of the North American Union into this discussion. Did you hear or see anyone vote for this corruption? (Beach Girl question.] By dismantling national borders, the EU has facilitated the largest migration waves in European history. When Poland became a member, many Poles moved to Britain, Germany etc. This left Poland with a labor shortage. They are now considering importing workers from the Ukraine and Russia to compensate for the Poles that left. At the same time, native Brits are fleeing to Spain because they don’t feel at home in Britain anymore. By such moves, you unleash a chain migration that will eventually smash nation states that have existed for ages. Yet this intra-European migration pales in comparison to the immigration from developing nations. The end result will — supposedly — be an entire continent of people without any national loyalties who will be divided, disoriented and thus presumably easier to control.
Remember the goal is to control us, to disorient us; to destroy our sense of national unity - that unity means we, as Americans, working together from our strengths; to turn our values upon us; to pound into our heads daily that all cultures are morally equivalent - I just bet the Southern Baptist Convention is okay with that; and to have our heads spinning in an upside-down world where we have no anchor points to hold on to - why? So that we will be lemmings and look to the very creators of our dilemma for our salvation. My friends, it takes balls to be that morally bankrupt. And in America most recently, one can look to the Immigration Bill of 1965. Even our government assures us that the "R.o.P." Islamic terrorists will be successful in attacking us on American soil - soon. Of course, some could be cynical and say, "Now that's a really 'cover your ass' kind of assurance." Hey, look - after the next attack, we'll hear: "We told you so! But those open borders are sure fine for Mexico and all those migratory wildlife critters." I have written about the "termites of Islamic terrorism" gnawing at our foundations. When you take a step or two back, you see that globalist groups such as the Council of Foreign Relations have been hard at work for a very long time. Add to that, the liberal-leftist socialists who have been chipping away at our individualism and freedoms for decades now, since the turn of the last century. But in "multiculturalism" they have all found a clever way to relax our immigration laws and increase their own poverty-based constituents. How clever is that? A person gets to come into the country under some excuse; if classified as a "minority", he can jump up the line, bring in extended family members, and get to vote. But the real bonus is that he gets to vote money out of your pocket and put it into his. How many trillions have we spent on the "Great Society" and the "War on poverty"? Are you getting richer? And for the "true" minorities - American blacks, American Indians, the Irish and others, who have gotten ahead legitimately - working hard and all the rest - they now get to support the "third-worlders" who are taking the jobs their kids should have as entry level jobs and they get to provide health-care and a kazillion benefits to the "third-worlders" here legally or illegally. We need a moratorium on legal immigration, NOW, and we need to stop illegal immigration DEAD in its tracks! You telling me it can't be done? Well, then don't go telling me this is the most powerful nation on earth. Powerful nations like concrete foundations or fortresses of stone can be brought down under constant attack even from humble grasses and vines, not to mention the tireless ant colonies - not even going to moles and such vermin. Take a look at your garden-variety ant workers and tell me you can really "negotiate" with them to please be good little ants and "don't destroy our home." Let me assure you, I believe in the American people. I believe we can come through anything but right now, we need to look to our strengths and we must not allow the concepts of "multiculturalism" and "political correctness" to tear us apart. We must see these concepts as the red herrings that they are. In the mix, know that - to the elites - "multiculturalism" does not include Western Civilization as worth saving. Well, it is! And we have to save it and the elite along with it - America has an American culture; Britain has a British culture; the nations I have visited and lived in have cultural characteristics unique to themselves. We do not need a "one world culture". Where would the diversity, charm, and national uniqueness be in that? Talk about boring... [Let me just amend this post a tad and say that I have faith in the many Europeans who are fighting Islamofascism within their own nations and who are making a stand against Islamic Imperialism such as the folks in Denmark. Emigrating is not the answer - fighting for what is good and worthwhile in your Western culture is the answer. If England falls - as an example - it will be bloody hell getting it back. And I don't want to Westminster Abbey in ruins or flying the star and crescent. Do you?] H/T to True Discernment at The EU and the Globalist Alliance from the Gates of Vienna.

Labels: , , ,

Navy Veteran accomplishes impossible dream!

Posted by a person who wishes to remain anonymous: BLIND NAVY VETERAN ACCOMPLISHES THE IMPOSSIBLE DREAM The Navy has a tradition of helping their own. Elroy day, a former bubble head has an incredible story to tell. He was blinded in a home invasion in North Carolina in 1995. He recently applied for and was accepted into the Purple Heart Service Foundations job training program to teach him how to become an at home call center agent. Against all odds, working with a disability that would stop most everyone else, he graduated. He completed 600 hours of hard training and now he is reaching out to other blind and vision disabled veterans to tell them about the opportunity that he had. He wants other blind veterans to come and join him. You see, he has a dream of opening a blinded veterans call center. Staffed by former members of the US military who are now blind, for what ever reason. You can help with his dream, just spreading the word. If you know of any veteran who is vision disabled, have them contact Elroy Day immediately . They can email him at or call Ms. Thompson at 703 835 3531. And remember, the Navy has a tradition of helping their own. ~~~~~~~~~~~

Labels: ,

Boy Scouts in Britain bow to Sharia Law - OMG

Hey, Scout leaders in Britain - anyone heard of having special meals prepared for the oh-so-"elite" among you so the rest of the boys can learn to be men? From the Daily Mail: Scouts banned from eating burgers and bangers - because of religious beliefs It is worse than I thought, even reading Londonistan! By the way, the Boy Scouts in Britain removed the offensive term, "boy", from the Boy Scouts in the 1960's. Can you believe this?

CAIR's pre-emptive strike against YAF!

Yes, the bastion "victim" group for Muslims victimized everywhere in America only obviously, uses pre-emptive strike against radical Islamic terrorists? No, against Young America's Foundation, here while seeking to censor and stifle freedom of speech of Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch. Well, atta boy, there CAIR, the self-appointed liaison between Islam and the US which is working mightily to gain more legitimacy from the Bush Administration and is positioning itself to be the negotiator between ALL Muslims living in America, the Islamic Law imposed by the Quran and dictated by the mullahs of Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood and other bastions of freedom and liberty. H/T to Falcon with his CAIR can go to hell and take their 72 virgins with them! - these are the 72 virgins, I might add, waiting in Paradise (?) to be raped and pillaged. Hot Air has it all at CAIR threatens Young America's Foundation, seeks to stifle Robert Spence with all the links and updates. Time to donate to the Young America's Foundation... [To Hot Air - please let us know when you are opening registration again. Thanks.]

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

  • International Civil Liberties Alliance
  • The Belmont Club
  • Gates of Vienna
  • The Blogmocracy
  • Larwyn's Linx at Director Blue
  • Boycott the New York Times -- Read the Real News at Larwyn's Linx
  • Conservative Blogs - Home Center Right
  • 100 Excellent Conservative blogs you should be reading
  • Antz in Pantz - Kickin' and Screamin'
  • Honor Killing in America - Never Forget
  • Sharia from European Court of the Rights of Man
  • Terrifying Brilliance of Islam
  • Triumph of Islam - How Primitive Tribalism Can Defeat Advanced Civilisation
  • Why is Islam so successful?
  • The Terrifying Brilliance of the Islamic Memeplex"
  • Three Things about Islam: Remember that the Quran is NOT the torah or the Bible
  • Links
  • Secure Freedom - NO Mosque at Ground Zero
  • Gates of Vienna - a MUST Read
  • Islam - The Religion of Peace
  • Muslim Domination of Public Space
  • Trencherbone