Eric Holder never met terrorists he didn't love

It seems to be true that Eric Holder, our Justice Department Csar has never met a terrorist or thief he didn't love. Anyone remember the 16 FALN terrorists he set free just before Hillary's election to the Senate in 2000 and the cuddly Marc Rich? Did Holder have a role in both of these hideous pardons? Read also: read here from book by Barbara Olson, killed in Islamic terrorists attacks of 9/11. According to "rumor" he plans to release Gitmo's worst terrorists into the United States: Guantanamo terrorists may be released into US. If you are a terrorist or a terrorist supporting nation which seems to include the US at the moment, you couldn't get a better ally than the Obama Administration. We give tax dollars to AIR and Citigroup, both practicing Sharia Law Finance so we support terrorist that way; regarding terrorists attacks upon us, we change the name, Islamic terrorist attack, to "man-made incidents". (Someone trying to be cute in a play on the words Weapons of Mass Destruction. No doubt Janet Napolitano our Secretary of Homeland destsruction. Maybe she wants to be invited for tea and some head-turning entertainment.) We are in the time-warp of 1984 by George Orwell. The Ministry of Justice is the Ministry of Injustice to law-abiding citizens; etc. Orwell got it right didn't he, even down to the language. Obama's true color seems to be shining through = RED for Socialist, Markist, CCCP. Of topic, but he sure seems to have brought Chicago politics to DC. Maybe the leftists on the Hill needed to be unleashed upon America so we could see how stark, raving mad and anti-the-US Constitution and the people these elected Lefists really are. Getting any idea yet? We give or plan to give $900,000,000.00 dollars to Hamas so they can buy more weapons and such to hurl at Israel; Obama first appoints Charles Freeman, an anti-semite and now Holder getting ready to release the worse-of-the-worst terrorists from Gitmo into the United States. Maybe the idea is to help Hugo Chavez and lighten his burden of training them on his soil so that they can get in across the border. Now, the United States Justice Department will just fly them in. And if they don't all land "guilty as Hell, free as a bird" (Bill Ayers), they'll go to a federal prison where they can recruit and train more terrorists.

Robert Spencer - Banned in Pakistan!

For a look at Robert Spencer's office, see Robert's Office and see also the following link, CAIR rep Omer Subhani exposes Robert Spencer, Part III. Well, it seems Mr. Spencer is in trouble AGAIN with his most recent book, The Truth about Muhammad: Founder of the World's Most Intolerant Religion. Banned in Pakistan. Why? Like the thorough researcher that he is, Mr. Spencer goes to original sources and uses Muslim/Islamic approved and accepted texts as his sources for the "truth" about Muhammad. The "truth" hurts when it comes from the mouth of a Westerner. Eh? In the synopsis here, we find:

In this startling new book, New York Times bestselling author Robert Spencer, provides a warts-and-all portrait of the Prophet of Islam and draws out what his life implies for reforming Islam and repulsing Islamic terrorists. Spencer relies solely on primary sources considered reliable by Muslims and evaluates modern biographies to show how Muhammad has been changed for Western audiences, lulling them into consoling but false conclusions.

It is true. Muhammad and Islam, for that matter, are brought to us from behind the mysterious "Dance of the Seven Veils", "Arabian Nights", and the mysteries of the middle east set to seduce us with allure and hidden fruit, secrets hidden behind carved lattice-work, scented oils, and perfumed air. But into that seduction, the Islamic terrorist, using stealth or whatever means possible. brings hatred and murder of innocents through cowardly acts of violence, his leaders too effeminate to wield the sword themselves as they hide behind their tea for visitors and lead lives of debauchery far from the wide, doe-like eyes of the naive Nancy Pelosi or the supporter Obama who, lucky for us based on his acknowledged years as a practicing Muslim from ages 6-10, understands the "legitimate claims" of Hamas, Hezbollah, and terrorist-supporting Iran, here. Behind these lattice walls, how many women hide beaten, battered, and bruised? How many children are taught hatred we cannot even dream of? And if we cannot criticize Islam from our own perspective, is it not a tad cynical that we cannot even use Islam's own books, written by Islam's own revered scholars from which to make our case? ~~~~~ We all know that in the Muslim world - the Middle East, Europe, and generally wherever there is a mosque - it is open season on any and all forms of Christianity to be ridiculed and worse. Some months ago, I put forth a request to my Muslim readers to provide me with a verse from the Qur'an or any other representative Islamic "ideological" text that had a directive similar to our "Golden Rule". They're getting back to me on that one.

South Carolina "terrorist" pipe-bomber plot linked to Sami Al-Arian Investigation

From Dan at Riehl World View, SC 2 Linked to Sami Al-Arian Investigation. If you recall, Sami Al-Arian is the University of Southern Florida fella who was helping the terrorists with funding, right? It is a relief to know that the two accused Middle Eastern engineering students here on student visas now have their copies of the Koran and their prayer rugs provided by CAIR as if these would-be terrorist bombers are somehow "political" prisoners. They are political prisoners in a way but that is prisoners of what is called "political" Islam. There are just too many Islams to keep track of: we have "spiritual" Islam; we have "political" Islam; we have "societal" Islam; we have moderate Muslims; we have Islamists; we have violent Islamic terrorists; we have Wahhabism and Salafism; we have "islamofascism"; and we have Islamic fundamentalism. We are just overwhelmed with Islamisms everywhere we look. To me it's really simple: all practitioners of Islam who want to kill infidels and apostates, step forward. But wait, they are doing that... Silly, silly me! Yep, just keep on giving out those student visas to men from the Middle East and don't forget to review your copy of Twenty-Year Plan: Islam Targets America. Check off Islamist accomplishments such as making someone like Representative John Conyers the lackey to Islamist groups. Aren't we Americans too smart to let this happen or are we too divided through dis-information and a weakened, as in not well-educated, citizenry? Can your high school graduate read his diploma? Can your high school graduate write a simple cover letter to a job application?

Diana West: speaking out for our freedoms

As recounted at Jihad Watch, Diana West, in West: Don't let them terrorize our freedoms, has once again spoken truth to the Islamic ideology of world domination. Using terrorism, the threat of terrorist attacks, and our own legal system, Islamists are attacking our very freedoms by trying to shut us up and intimidate us into "censoring" ourselves. Diana West delineates the tactics used against us. Also, please see Robert Spencer's speech at the Young America's Foundation. Just a few words from West's column:

At this point, I interrupt this column to apologize to all leftists settling in for a juicy tirade against the Patriot Act, wiretaps for terrorists or the sufferings of sensitive poets in residence at Guantanamo Bay. It is not the Bush administration's efforts to protect us from "terror" (more maturely known as jihad) that compromise our freedoms, but jihad itself. And the basic freedom to discuss, analyze, debate, imagine and resist jihad is now under unprecedented assault. Consider the following events...

Let me add also that "hate-speech" laws are designed to intimidate and crush our Freedom of Speech. We must fight these laws every step of the way. Remember, this is a jihad, a "holy war", against Christianity and the Western World, Islam's ruthless global war against Christianity. You can call the war whatever you like but make no mistake, this so-called "war on terror" is the result of a full-frontal Islamic attack against Christianity.

Islamic terrorists, evil spawn of Globalists and Theocracy?

Last night I ranted a bit about "multiculturalism" and how the concept has been put into practice for decades to erode and reduce the planet to a globe without nations in Multiculturalism, infectious globalism now pandemic!. The consequences of breaking down Western Civilization and destroying weaker developing nations are becoming more apparent daily with the chaos and confusion along with the feeling of defenselessness as citizens watch their governments, once the bastions of national sovereignty, actively work to introduce hoards of people from very divergent cultures into once stabilized nations. For Globalists and the One World Order crowd, the League of Nations was a failure but then too is the United Nations in being the panacea to cure all ills. The hypocrisy of the United Nations is chronicled in a myriad of places, not the least of which is Screw the UN and books such as The Tower of Babble: How the United Nations has fueled Global Chaos by Dore Gold. A biography of Dore Gore can be found here. For an interview with Gold on Saudi Arabia's funding and providing safe refuge for al-Qaeda, the following may be of interest, The War on America is not over". So the answer, tear the nations down from within through "multiculturalism" and then censor all honest discussion through "political correctness." My simple question in this post is this: Is Islamic terrorism an unintended consequence of the globalists effort at "world" dominance? Has "multiculturalism" - with the help of American and European liberal Socialists - become the effective and efficient method of spreading Islamic terrorism? Many of us have written about the clash of "cultures" and the current Islamic push for Islamic domination as being one more battle in the centuries-old war between Christianity and Islam. I believe that is still true at the ground level; the soldier-to-soldier level. But is the reality more sinister than that? I have to wonder if Globalists - along with their Leftist Socialists - intended to give birth to violent Islamic terrorism or was it somehow an "accident" of conception that, with the advent of "multiculturalism" and the establishing of Islamic beach heads in Western nations, the physical world leaders of Islam saw their chance to move into the destabilized nations of the West? Western leaders are begging for them to migrate, so why not oblige? We thought we had "defeated" Communism; we believe in national sovereignty. The Globalists seem to believe that all the world should be "third world" and powerful nations brought to heel. The Socialists seem to believe that my hard-earned dollars belong to them to give to their "beggar-based constituency" (coined by Rush Limbaugh I believe). The Globalists depend on people being able to "buy" things to keep the Globalists power in place. The Socialists seem to believe in reducing us all to submission. For purposes of this post, I see the Globalists and Socialists as one, just perhaps with different methods toward reaching their respective end of world domination. And along comes the 7th Century blushing bride - Islamic Theocracy which believes that its "physical leaders" are destined to rule the world. A marriage frought with all manner of consequences. But before the honeymoon, whoops, their bastards - Islamic terrorists - blinked their eyes in this "brave new world" of "one world order" and said, "Yowsah! This multiculturalism was made for us. We can hide anywhere and cry that we are victims. That'll work." Are violent Islamic terrorists the intended spawn of the "one world order" crowd to keep us off balance and to enable them to chain us in the world of "Real ID" cards, microchips in the butt, or are the violent Islamic terrorists just an accident that needs to be aborted before the grand designs of the Globalists go up in smoke?

Pakistan & Iraq - center of universe?

Have Pakistan and Iraq become the center of the universe? In terms of fighting this "global war against Islamic terrorists"? Back on October 19, 2006 when I was relatively new at blogging, I wrote an post about "as Iraq goes, so goes Europe". From reading Londonistan, England seems already "gone" and it will take something serious to get their attention. Something heinous to wake the government officials from allowing and encouraging the nation to be a "safe haven" for Islamic terrorist training right there in their midst. Out of curiosity, did the IRA have the "freedom" to set up training camps right there in England and London? At all. Or is it only the Islamic terrorists under the Harry Potter-like invisibility cloak of multiculturalism gone amuk who are afforded such accommodation? England should probably be on the State Departments - Don't go there list - just like the US southern border is but it seems to me that we must continue to fight the Islamic terrorists in Iraq and help Musharraf with whatever he needs in Pakistan. We're already only a mud hut or two away in Afghanistan so if Musharraf calls, we can deliver. We had better do it fast 'cause if the Dems get the White House we'll all be in trouble. Watch the DOW tank then! And get your burka... The Dems love those moo-moo sorts of garments. You'll know how happy the Islamic terrorists will be 'cause "there'll be dancin' in the streets" of New York, L.A., San Francisco, Dearborn, parts of Arizona, Red House, Virginia, and the rest of the islamic world. I'll bet there'll even be a toast of sweet tea at CAIR headquarters.

God help the Brits and other terrorist-related stories

May God help the Brits! Taking a trick out of the US play book for ensured agency inefficiency, Gordon Brown has announced that he will be combining the Border and Immigration Agency with the Revenue and Customs and UKVisas agencies. UK to Get Border Police and here at Brown creates united force to police border. In the latter account, the "embarkation controls, abolished nearly 10 years ago, will be restored."... Brown also emphasised the importance of winning "hearts and minds" in the Muslim community... From the Scotsman, Air chiefs alerted to terrorists 'dry runs' - this in the United States where our Leftist congress and Senate want the flying imams to be able to sue passengers who point out "terrorist-like" behavior aboard airlines. My God, the leftists want to kill us all. Ah, maybe that's why they like the Islamists so well or is it simply that protecting American passengers from lawsuits would cut into the money lawyers could get out of them? Yep, what we want is happy lawyers, happy Islamists, and traumatized airline passengers. Then in Pakistan, Musharraf is having his hands full: Rockets kill 10 in northwest Pakistan. Are our leaders completely daft?

President Nicolas Sarkozy - a man for our times?

President Nicolas Sarkozy - a man for our times? I know hope is for "suckers" but I must admit that I hope Sarkozy is the man to pull Europe back from the growing slid into Islamic Republics. The news from Holland is not good as pointed out by R. Hartman in Bad news from Holland where officials seem to know little about Islam and its political ideology. Merv brings us, Just war against Islamist terrorist in which we

"look at the way Arabs are being killed by al-Qaeda in the Anbar province of Iraq or at the murders of barbers in Basra, or the decision by an Iranian court to order a 43-year-old woman named Mokarrameh Ebrahimi to be stoned to death for adultery, which Amnesty International says 'beggars belief'... Brutality has come to signify purity of faith among the followers of radicalised sects just as it did for the mass murderers of the Khmer Rouge...."

On top of this we have 4,000 al Qaeda trainees sent to UK from Prairie Pundit. The West and Western Civilization need a man for our time, a man who will defend our culture and preserve our way of life. Of course, we must do our part by becoming informed and by informing our politicians. But today, by chance, I came across President Sarkozy's recent speech at Epinal, France on July 12, 2007. I was unable to take notes quickly enough but here is some of what he said - paraphrased, naturally - please forgive errors.

French President Nicolas Sarkozy spoke of accountability in government as well as accountability of the French people themselves. He encouraged all citizens to assume the rights and responsibilities of citizenship in a secular society. Essentially, people who do not support the secularism that is France - should not remain there. The French are one people under secular law.

To me, Nicolas Sarkozy is the hope of France, the hope of Europe, and perhaps the hope of Western Civilization, a man who can focus our attention and our goals of maintaining our democratic republics in the face of the relentless and ruthless push of Islamic fundamentalism which is seeking world domination through terrorism, through extortion, through law suits, and through any and all forms of intimidation available. See Twenty-Year Plan: Islam Targets America. But Sarkozy sits there in France with the largest international training site for terrorists right across the channel in Great Britain, flourishing in London itself. Back to his points - paraphrased and subtle -

if one wants an Islamic Europe, more specifically, an Islamic France, their energies are wasted, they should go back to and modernize Islamic republics to move into the 21st Century moving them from barbarism to civility - freeing women from slavery, freeing "dhimmis" from the brutality of the Islamic regime or they should mire Islam's followers further into the mire of the past. The case can be made that Muslims who want freedom should stay in their countries and work for that goal. Wisely, he stated that there would be no amnesties coming from his office. He pointed out the importance of discussing issues including the issue of the judiciary and its move to take over or usurp legislative power or responsibilities. He is clearly not in favor of judges taking power over legislative authority. "I want open dialogue on issues. We should never fear debate."

Perhaps, he hasn't yet had Islamists push for "hate speech" laws as they are in the United States that would end debate. He stressed, "The goal of my effort is that we have new values toward work." He seems very much opposed to the capital-killing taxes on people who work while those taxes provide support to people who don't contribute and don't work. He ended with "Long live the Republic. Long live France!" Will Nicholas Sarkozy be the Winston Churchill of our times? I don't know. All I know is that we need Western leaders who see the threat and deal with it, not turn their toes up and assume room temperature. So, "Long live the Republic. Long live France!" To Nicholas Sarkozy - good luck and godspeed. We may all be depending on you and your efforts to set things aright in your "secular" society and in doing so, set an example for other Western European leaders to follow. First, the EU needs to be weakened along with the weakening of international judges usurping the will of any given nation's citizens. Then onward to liberty!