Monday, August 06, 2007

Republican Party hijacked by the "new world order" folks?

The following post was filed by Mickey over at Blue Collar Republican, The Self Destruction of the Republican Party. I have included it here in full. It deserves a good look. (emphasis added)
The Republican Party is being destroyed, but not by the ‘far Religious Right’. It is in disarray because of the moderates and the Neo-Conservatives who run it. The moderates have done nothing but sit on the fence (go along to get along). They are useless. The NeoCons have taken over the party. Their leaders have ‘exported’ Democracy by championing America meddling in the rest of the world’s affairs, they oppose isolationism, and they believe in the New Deal (socialistic big government). The Republican Party of today is the Liberal Democratic Party of yesterday: Bush has increased the national debt, Clinton increased the national debt. Bush fights Un-Constitutional wars, Clinton fought Un-Constitutional wars. Bush is providing more national health care, Clinton wanted more national health care. Clinton wanted more and bigger government and gave us NAFTA. Bush wants more and bigger government and gave us CAFTA, Homeland Security and the failed Leave No Child Behind. The ‘far Religious Right’ will soon learn there is only one Party. The Socialist party. Perhaps they will wake up and come to the Constitution Party, here.
Some of those of us who are conservatives have heretofore had no place to go but the Republican Party - that is where I am active now but as readers know I am no fan of "globalism" and "open-borders" or amnesty/citizenship for people who spit on our laws as they litter our land and destroy our rivers invading our nation. Forgive a bit of digression here but I really don't like hearing 911 calls in a language other than English and those calls having to be answered by a dispatcher in other than English. I don't like our Emergency Rooms over-run by illegals and foreign-language speakers who demand interpreters or the hospital gets sued. That's not a "diverse" America; that's a dysfunctional America. As history proves, a people are most vulnerable when they do not speak the same language. A common language lends itself to at least a unified citizenry - I don't mean we march to the same "political" drumbeats but at least we can disagree in the same language. As I recall from reading of our nation's founding that the Founding Fathers, most notably George Washington along with others, did not believe that America should involve itself in "wars" within any given nation. Rather, they supported the view that a nation's internal strife was within the province of that nation's people to work out. They also supported the notion that America could engage in trade as she saw fit - but certainly they would view our out-sourcing of jobs, our taxes that punish business and consumers alike, and other issues such as the North American Union designed under the rubric of "free trade" to be anything but good for the sovereignty of the United States of America or its citizens. I believe the Founding Fathers would be aghast at the "new world order" crowd and even more astonished with the notion that it is our "national destiny" to spread democracy around the world because "democracies don't have wars with each other." Mexico's feet-on-the-ground invasion of the US could call that notion into question - because we are being invaded and just as dangerously as a uniformed army with its conquering forces would be. Only difference is that our government would be fighting back instead of rolling over with its four paws in the air in a total act of "submission." In my view, globalism/new world order and using our "military to spread democracy" abroad while failing to defend our democratic republic at home is probably not what the Founding Fathers had in mind. Jefferson sent our Marines to Tripoli, not to spread democracy, but to protect and defend our sailors who were being kidnapped and killed by Muslims of the time, to defend our ships and our trading interests. Jefferson's was a far different mission than that of using our military to spread democracy. Current incidents demonstrate the an infiltrating jihadi force under the cover of "multiculturalism" can be more effective in weakening and undermining a nation. Melanie Phillips' Londonistan is quite clear on the effectiveness of a jihadist force in spreading chaos. In Election 2008, we need to scrutinize the candidates on their view of our role in the world. We can't afford to be "fooled" through this NAFTA and CAFTA cant. Ross was right about that "great sucking sound."

Labels: , ,

Friday, August 03, 2007

Multiculturalism, infectious globalism now pandemic!

A post at the Gates of Vienna, The EU and Globalist Alliance, led to a late-evening rant... Far more deadly than a speeding train or even conventional weapons, the mantra of "multiculturalism" has become the chant to stop discussion of issues that effect and alter the cohesion of a nation's people beyond repair; a mantra couched as "diversity" and how that is really good for a nation. Multiculturalism is designed to weaken all strong nations and destroy completely the weaker ones. Problem - the CDC has no antidote but then how could they? And of course in America, if one even wants to discuss "multiculturalism" and adverse effects it may be having due to cultures not "assimilating" into our "American" culture, one is called a racist. In America that is absurd in that we are so diverse. However, true, racist hate-groups that call themselves "The Race" are immune to a scrutiny of their agenda. Because, whoops, that scrutiny would be "racist". There is just one tad of perspective that seems to have been left out of the equation in this multicultural panacea of "globalism": Islam. [music to Darth Vador in the background.] We are told, or at least I have read, that Muslims belong to Islam and have no loyalties to any physical, bordered nation, but rather are only loyal to Islam - as dictated and interpreted by which mullah or ayatollah is in charge. If that is true, then it follows that once the "globalists" finish destroying Western Civilization and weakening smaller nations totally, the only "nation" that will remain standing is Islam - a political, societal ideology that encompasses and rigidly controls an individual's life from cradle to grave, stripping away any chance at the freedoms we in the West hold dear. An ideology that controls through beheadings, honour killings, severing of hands for infractions, and even letting young school girls burn to death in a school fire; an ideology that has no mercy or compassion for its own followers and exhorts them to kill - certainly not assimilate with - infidels. Infidels are not restricted just to non-Muslims. Some Muslims have been targeted as well for not being "muslim" enough. That notion strikes me as "funny" because I listened to an interview with a baseball star who is black saying that another player was not "black enough" because the other player is 1/2 black and 1/2 white. Can't continue to have this "race card" thing both ways. It seems that, like it or not, we are not only fighting Islamofascism but our own "home-grown" globalists as well. Not good. The following is from the Gates of Vienna and posted under the title, The EU and Globalist Alliance: (emphasis added)
Here is an interesting comment about Multiculturalism posted at a website in, of all places, Bangladesh: “Multiculturalism is an unnatural and unhealthy condition that can only afflict countries in national decline. (…) Greed and corruption will characterise the government coupled with oppressive measures directed against its citizens. Lies and deceit will be the stock and trade of media, politicians, and educational institutions.” Multiculturalism “is used to prevent a national consensus among the electorate. It erodes values, cultures, beliefs, religions, ethnic habits, etc. ensuring a swirling river of discontent upon which the multiculturalists rides. It is a perfect method of ensuring that there can never be accord, unity, or a commonly shared destiny among those ruled.” In other words: Multiculturalism is simply a tool for divide and conquer. Is there then any point in trying to comprehend its logic at all? Maybe it was just a convenient excuse used for disrupting the established order of nation states by flooding them with mass immigration under the cover of “cultural diversity” or historical inevitability. If that is the case, there never was any coherent logic behind it, so we shouldn’t waste our time looking for one. Many of those promulgating it never believed a word of it themselves. Multiculturalism is the new Allah: Don’t understand, just obey. This was undertaken by a coalition of different groups with a shared goal of undermining Western nation states. I heard supporters of mass immigration a generation ago state that all this talk about how it would change our societies into the unrecognizable was scare-mongering and racism. Now, the same groups are saying that yes, our societies have been changed forever. It’s good, and it’s anyway too late to do anything about it, so get used to it! Their propaganda was used to deceive the public and keep it off balance in order to implement potentially irreversible changes with little real debate. They knew they would never get the permission to destroy their own countries, so they simply didn’t ask. [I am tossing the idea of the North American Union into this discussion. Did you hear or see anyone vote for this corruption? (Beach Girl question.] By dismantling national borders, the EU has facilitated the largest migration waves in European history. When Poland became a member, many Poles moved to Britain, Germany etc. This left Poland with a labor shortage. They are now considering importing workers from the Ukraine and Russia to compensate for the Poles that left. At the same time, native Brits are fleeing to Spain because they don’t feel at home in Britain anymore. By such moves, you unleash a chain migration that will eventually smash nation states that have existed for ages. Yet this intra-European migration pales in comparison to the immigration from developing nations. The end result will — supposedly — be an entire continent of people without any national loyalties who will be divided, disoriented and thus presumably easier to control.
Remember the goal is to control us, to disorient us; to destroy our sense of national unity - that unity means we, as Americans, working together from our strengths; to turn our values upon us; to pound into our heads daily that all cultures are morally equivalent - I just bet the Southern Baptist Convention is okay with that; and to have our heads spinning in an upside-down world where we have no anchor points to hold on to - why? So that we will be lemmings and look to the very creators of our dilemma for our salvation. My friends, it takes balls to be that morally bankrupt. And in America most recently, one can look to the Immigration Bill of 1965. Even our government assures us that the "R.o.P." Islamic terrorists will be successful in attacking us on American soil - soon. Of course, some could be cynical and say, "Now that's a really 'cover your ass' kind of assurance." Hey, look - after the next attack, we'll hear: "We told you so! But those open borders are sure fine for Mexico and all those migratory wildlife critters." I have written about the "termites of Islamic terrorism" gnawing at our foundations. When you take a step or two back, you see that globalist groups such as the Council of Foreign Relations have been hard at work for a very long time. Add to that, the liberal-leftist socialists who have been chipping away at our individualism and freedoms for decades now, since the turn of the last century. But in "multiculturalism" they have all found a clever way to relax our immigration laws and increase their own poverty-based constituents. How clever is that? A person gets to come into the country under some excuse; if classified as a "minority", he can jump up the line, bring in extended family members, and get to vote. But the real bonus is that he gets to vote money out of your pocket and put it into his. How many trillions have we spent on the "Great Society" and the "War on poverty"? Are you getting richer? And for the "true" minorities - American blacks, American Indians, the Irish and others, who have gotten ahead legitimately - working hard and all the rest - they now get to support the "third-worlders" who are taking the jobs their kids should have as entry level jobs and they get to provide health-care and a kazillion benefits to the "third-worlders" here legally or illegally. We need a moratorium on legal immigration, NOW, and we need to stop illegal immigration DEAD in its tracks! You telling me it can't be done? Well, then don't go telling me this is the most powerful nation on earth. Powerful nations like concrete foundations or fortresses of stone can be brought down under constant attack even from humble grasses and vines, not to mention the tireless ant colonies - not even going to moles and such vermin. Take a look at your garden-variety ant workers and tell me you can really "negotiate" with them to please be good little ants and "don't destroy our home." Let me assure you, I believe in the American people. I believe we can come through anything but right now, we need to look to our strengths and we must not allow the concepts of "multiculturalism" and "political correctness" to tear us apart. We must see these concepts as the red herrings that they are. In the mix, know that - to the elites - "multiculturalism" does not include Western Civilization as worth saving. Well, it is! And we have to save it and the elite along with it - America has an American culture; Britain has a British culture; the nations I have visited and lived in have cultural characteristics unique to themselves. We do not need a "one world culture". Where would the diversity, charm, and national uniqueness be in that? Talk about boring... [Let me just amend this post a tad and say that I have faith in the many Europeans who are fighting Islamofascism within their own nations and who are making a stand against Islamic Imperialism such as the folks in Denmark. Emigrating is not the answer - fighting for what is good and worthwhile in your Western culture is the answer. If England falls - as an example - it will be bloody hell getting it back. And I don't want to Westminster Abbey in ruins or flying the star and crescent. Do you?] H/T to True Discernment at The EU and the Globalist Alliance from the Gates of Vienna.

Labels: , , ,

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

  • International Civil Liberties Alliance
  • The Belmont Club
  • Gates of Vienna
  • The Blogmocracy
  • Larwyn's Linx at Director Blue
  • Boycott the New York Times -- Read the Real News at Larwyn's Linx
  • Conservative Blogs - Home Center Right
  • 100 Excellent Conservative blogs you should be reading
  • Antz in Pantz - Kickin' and Screamin'
  • Honor Killing in America - Never Forget
  • Sharia from European Court of the Rights of Man
  • Terrifying Brilliance of Islam
  • Triumph of Islam - How Primitive Tribalism Can Defeat Advanced Civilisation
  • Why is Islam so successful?
  • The Terrifying Brilliance of the Islamic Memeplex"
  • Three Things about Islam: Remember that the Quran is NOT the torah or the Bible
  • Links
  • Secure Freedom - NO Mosque at Ground Zero
  • Gates of Vienna - a MUST Read
  • Islam - The Religion of Peace
  • Muslim Domination of Public Space
  • Trencherbone