Obama: his 'drafted' Young Pioneers?

At first one has to wonder where Obama will get his "civilian national security force" that is to be stronger than our military and that will act on American soil against Americans. Brownshirts undercover. Could be ACORN and the "greens" under Van Jones. But now we have a clearer picture unfolding. Not 'volunteer' service but mandatory service with uniforms and territories. Big H/T to Michael Savage for his "Obama's plan to force kids into paramilitary domestic army exposed". This is the title of the link at Michael's site that sends you to an article by Bob Unruh at World Net Daily: House adopts plan for 'volunteer' corps. Think of Mao and his army of "youth" who destroyed all of the culture of China that they could and herded all dissenters into re-education/indoctrination camps; think of Cambodia's Khmer Rouge; think Lord of the Flies. And as Michael Savage says, to paraphrase, Obama's youth will be modeled after Russia's "Young Pioneers". We'll never know how many parents were turned in to the KGB (whatever their secret police were called at the time of the Black Marias and the thump on the door in the middle of the night, never to see daylight or their children again, turned in by their own children. Info on Young Pioneers and here. Here is a link to the actual vote on HR 1388 of the 111th Congress: HR 1388: To reauthorize and reform the national service law. The bill is here. And from the Heritage, Brian Brown has written an excellent article The Death of Public Service. We have to keep in mind that Obama is first and foremost a "community agitator", "community organizer", an avid student of Saul Alinsky and a avid participant in the Chicago political machine, so Obama's means of bringing about his goals would include a component of community-based and organized gangs. What would these "uniformed" gangs do? From what is available it seems to be "volunteer" but you know how peer pressure works on youth. If you are the odd-man out, not in uniform, soon you'll cave to be in a uniform with your friends attending special training at special indoctrination "camps." We can undo the damage Obama creates through lawful, non-violent means = vote Republican in 2010. Or vote another party other than Democrat, but we must all vote as one body. Our childrens' futures depend on it and it appears our very freedoms depend on Americans sticking together to fight socialism and to fight against an Imperial Presidency of our President of Punishment.

Obama: Will brown shirts wear green?

Will Obama's Civilian SS "brownshirts" wear green and report to San Fran Van Jones? The ruberic is to start out with community service - like the Peace Corps - learning to do "green" jobs and then going on to community colleges and/or jobs. Early-on, Obama said loudly before the presidential election that we needed a "civilian national security force" as well funded as our military that would act within our nation - presumably against our citizens. I wrote "the brown shirts are coming; the brown shirts are coming." But the color of the shirt is not important. What is important is that Obama is appointing people to positions of immense power, positions - appointment to which - circumvent any Congressional scrutiny or oversight - not that the Dems do that very well anyway (Barney and Chris come to mind) - but Obama is building his Csars that are accountable to no one except him with powers given to them by him. The goal is Nationalist Socialism; the end of our free market capitalism; the end of our freedoms through the destructive "green" laws. Just look at your excellent "government ordered" toilets that you must flush TWICE and look at the HAZ-MAT light bulbs. Look at a world map. How in the world can the United States of America be shackled with such destructive regulations and maintain a dynamic economy? Just search on Van Jones - Green Csar - for plenty of posts. By the way, Jones graduated Yale Law in 1993 and did the Obama-deal, got involved in "grant" funded or 501 (c) 3 groups. H/T to Michael Savage of San Francisco who knows of Van Jones and Jones' work against the San Francisco police for years: Obama appoints cop-hater as 'green czar' Additional Van Jones info: Van Jones just confirmed as Obama’s ‘Green Jobs Czar’ The Green Solution Friedman on Van Jones, an "organizer" who has attacked the police in San Francisco for years has been appointed by Obama as the Green Jobs Czar. What does that mean? Remember, Obama was a "community agitator" who taught ACORN folks how to intimidate bankers into giving risky loans, a national group already in place with millions of tax dollars funding them; a group easily converted into "green shirts". An SFPD detective is now talking on Savage's show about how Jones has his own bodyguards, intimidated the police. Essentially to protect the detective no much can be said... Jones has testified for "green jobs" before Congress twice (?) already. I think one thing we have to be very aware of is that Obama is moving very quickly from one thing to the next so that we cannot focus on anything. He has a compliant Congress unless San Fran Nan gets her nose out of joint if she can't get a military plane when she wants it but otherwise, Obama will work fast before we have a chance to know what hit us. Stalin worked quickly too but he "ate" the ones who put him in power. Well, he didn't "eat" them; he sent them to the camps or otherwise got rid of them when they had outlived their usefulness.

John Conyers, Jr: Democrats salivate to investigate Bush!

Under the frothing-at-the-mouth direction of Congressman John Conyers, Jr, Democrats salivate to investigate Bush! So, for distraction number one, investigations of President Bush may be trotted out at the "dog and pony" show to galvanize our attention while other "stuff" may be going on under the radar. Like Paul Begala said of the Clinton Administration. (paraphrasing) "Hey it was great! Want something done? Write an Executive Order. Boom! And it's done!" From the Drudge Report, Democrats plan to investigate Bush once out of office looks like a nasty bit of business with John Conyers, Jr. playing the lead in "Democrats gone wild." From the New York Times, Bush, Out of Office, Could Oppose Inquiries, we gain some insight into the harassing investigations the Democrats want to bring against President George W. Bush. At last, they will be able to "throw the kitchen sink" at the President they have loved to hate and through their very hatred done such harm to our nation both internally and internationally that when we speak of American prestige abroad, we have much for which to thank the Democrat rancor and their avenging angels of the MSM including the paper from which I have linked an article today. So, some good news! Maybe the Democrats and the ACLU as well as all of the other "hate mongers" will be distracted for a time and we, the people, may be able to stay under their radar for a short time. But I fear that may be wishful thinking and naive on my part. Obama has "large plans" and the American people as well may find themselves distracted by the Democrat-MSM media show trials against President Bush while the real mischief is being made in the most seemingly innocuous ways. Personally, one woman's opinion, we have much to fear from Obama's intended proposal to create a Civilian National Security Force, as strong or stronger than our military. Our military is constrained from attacking American citizens on American soil; a Civilian National Security Force, much like the Guatemalan National Police from the 1966-1996 era and perhaps the Mexican Military Police/Federales of today or even Russia's KGB, or the Brown Shirts from another era, would have no such constraint. As a matter of fact, such a force would be created to have no such constraint as The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878. I am reading a book at the moment, Grave Secrets by Kathy Reichs. Her book deals partly with the deaths of thousands of civilians in Guatemala from 1966 to 1996. (Yes, I've read about our "involvement". This post is not about that.) When addressing the idea of a Civilian National Security Force, the American Thinker posted, Obama's Civilian National Security Force and interestingly wrote off Joseph Farah's column in World Net Daily, Obama's 'civilian national security force' as perhaps extreme or naive, saying: "The entire plan is breathtaking in its scope. But it does not, as at least one internet writer (Joseph Farah - name inserted here, link provided in American Thinker post) has suggested, portend a "giant police force...." The American Thinker goes on to express (paraphrased here) that Obama's idea is simply naive, pointing out that his idea, a true Civilian National Security Force with full strength like our military, "...would be easier to rebut if it did. As it is, it's silly stuff born of naively fanciful dreams." "It's silly stuff born of naively fanciful dreams".... Hmmm.... Have we so quickly forgotten Obama's training in the ways of Saul Alinsky and here? His Marxist training at his mother's knee? (Stanley Ann Dunham Obama Soetoro has been described as "a radical leftist and cultural Marxist.") Have we forgotten the Black Panthers marshalling their forces at some polling places on Nov. 4th? I have to bow to the superior and consistently excellent writing at The American Thinker but Obama scares the Be-Jeezus out of me. And as "naive" as the idea of his "Civilian National Security Force" may seem, the embers are rife with possibilities, even more possible as a response to another terrorist attack - made to order - on our soil. We have proved our willingness to discard freedom and liberty by our easy acceptance of the "Patriot Act" and the TSA. What's the saying, "Well, I haven't done anything wrong. Let the government see any and all of my personal records. And DNA and fingerprints on a National ID Card? No worries..." One woman's opinion and the opinion of one woman who has a gained a moderate perspective through study of American as well as European history - it is those "naively fanciful dreams", that "dream the impossible dream" stuff, about which we should be very vigilant. And now, more than ever, we must work hard to recognize the "distractions" for what they are: distractions while the really important "stuff" is happening; the stuff we will find it impossible to reverse once it takes hold. Freedom isn't free! It requires courage, hard work, and vigilance and, when required, non-violent action to protect and preserve. Cross-posted at Eternity Road.