Islam's culture of hatred on display in US: Honor Killing in North Texas
The following post is from A Keyboard and a .45, Honor Killing in North Texas. See Blue Collar Republican, Blog Burst - January 4, 2008. We must end the importation of such horror to the United States - a horror embedded into the tenets of a "religion" that exhorts a father to kill his daughters for dating non-Muslims. We are breeding hatred against us within our own nation; we are importing hatred against us under the guise of "multiculturalism"; we are allowing such hatred into our nation, and we have to stop - it's called survival of our culture and our heritage for decency and integrity. Can anyone read the story of the Muslim father murdering his two daughters and see any American decency and integrity there? We are taught to love and cherish our children and our sons are taught to protect their sisters, not kill them... Read the post; it will make you sick and it will teach you more about Islam's hatred than you want to know. Even at the same time, the United Nations tells us not to criticize Islam... We have to get a handle on this insanity, folks, or it will get a handle on us... It is not hatred to call for the protection of our nation, our culture, our heritage. Islam is not compatible with our Western Civilization and the Islamists say so themselves. Read the Koran, read their words, and tell me I'm wrong... And stop to put flowers on the graves of these two young women killed by their own father, such is the insanity we are dealing with and the destruction we are bringing upon ourselves. As the blogger said if a Muslim father will kill his own daughters, what's to keep him from killing the non-Muslims they were dating? Good question. Where is the outrage from CAIR and from "moderate" Muslims? Another good question... The answer - there can be no outrage against the father because he only did what the Koran told him to do! So, the case could be made in our "multicultural" fairyland that he is not guilty of murder; Sharia Law is above the laws of the United States and therefore, he is not subject to our secular laws. In an Islamic nation, he's "home free", so why is he here? Because the goal is to place us under Sharia Law. We are becoming a very sick society. What will it take to make us well? What will it take to give us a solid pride in our heritage that says a father does not murder his daughters? What will it take to bring back shame and to restore our courage and pride? Are we fighting in Iraq to bring such horrors as "honor killings" to our own lands? If so, then I say, let's fight the terrorists here and be done with them and their ilk.
<$PostedBy Beach Girlo$> <$AtTimeWithPermalink$>
19 Comments:
A pro-Israeli British blogger faces arrest and years of imprisonment for telling the truth about Islam. Is this the start of the British government's clampdown on the counter-jihadist blogosphere in response to the recent UN resolution on 'defamation of Islam'?
One commenter on the original post indicated that he hoped that the goblin would resist arrest and be killed. I disagree.
I hope he is arrested and that his trial becomes very public. Where 9/11 was an act of terrorism by people from "over there", this tragedy was up close and personal. This goblin lived in the United States for 20 years. 20 years in our midst, yet still apart from our culture.
I pray that folks actually take notice and start to think about the potential ramifications of continuing to hand out visas like candy to Islamist who have absolutely no regard for us our way of life.
This new study just released shows a lot about how Americans view Muslims.
Perceptions Differ of Woman With and Without a Shawl on her Head -
FLEMINGTON, N.J., Jan. 4 /PRNewswire/ -- A new national study of more
than 600 Americans revealed that a woman wearing a shawl or hijab,
typically worn by Muslim women, is viewed significantly different than the
same woman without the traditional headwear.
The study was conducted by HCD Research, using its mediacurves.com web
site during January 2-3, to determine whether Americans possess different
views of a woman based on whether or not she wears traditional Muslim
headwear.
Participants were divided into two randomly assigned groups. Members of
each group were asked to view one of two separate photos of an attractive
young woman. Neither photo was identified in any way. Each sample was then
asked identical questions about the woman, her age, perceived personality,
activities, and how acceptable she might be as a neighbor.
One-third of participants indicated that they would rather have the
woman with the traditional headwear live in another place, another city,
and maybe out of the U.S., as opposed to living in their neighborhood.
However, a clear majority of participants (89%) reported that the woman
without the shawl would be welcome in their neighborhood.
The woman with the shawl on her head was perceived as somewhat older,
and somewhat better off financially than the woman without the shawl. While
the woman with the shawl was more likely to be a stay at home mother, the
woman without the shawl might be a working married woman.
The woman with the shawl on her head was also viewed as much more
traditional than the woman without the shawl. Participants also indicated
that the woman with the shawl was strict and rigid, a good wife and devoted
mother. She was also perceived as keeping to herself or a tight circle of
people. Conversely, the woman without the shawl was perceived to be lively,
friendly, and humorous. She was also viewed as a person who "always looks
at the bright side" and might even be the life of the party.
Overwhelmingly, both photos of the woman were viewed as being
attractive. However, more people thought the woman with the shawl was
beautiful, and both women were seen as trustworthy.
At the end of the questionnaire, the participants specifically
identified the woman with the shawl on her head as Middle-Eastern in origin
and a Muslim; the woman without the shawl was perceived as an American and
a Catholic (maybe Protestant or Jewish).
For detailed information on this study, please go to
http://www.mediacurves.com The Media Curves web site provides the media and
general public with a venue to view Americans' perceptions of popular and
controversial media events and advertisements.
Headquartered in Flemington, NJ, the company's services include
traditional and web-based communications research. For additional
information on HCD Research, access the company's web site at http://www.hcdi.net
or call HCD Research at 908-788-9393.
Islam is a political movement that must be stopped. The first thing is to take away its tax exeption and make them pay taxes on their Mosques. Second, we need to stop all immigration of individuals that follow Islam. If we take that step and "force" the moderate Muslims (if there is such a thing) out of the woodwork to start speaking out about these types of outrageous incidents, maybe we can figure out whether or not Islam could be "peaceful"! Third, secure the damn border. Kay Bailey Hutchinson just added an ammendment to a bill to gut the border fence bill of 2006. No one is talking about it. (I have a link on my site if you want to check it out). I get sick when I read these stories.
There is one solution to the muzlim problem and only one. They must all be removed from Western civilization. That sounds harsh, and some will say, "what about the moderate muzlims, can't they stay?" The answer is "No, they all have to go."
There are two fundamental characteristics of Izlam that make it impossible for us to coexist with it in our territory. These are:
1. It has as a religious requirement that it must seek to conquer the world, bringing all people under Izlam;
2. I has as a fundamental tenet of the faith the principle that muzlims are to lie whenever it is advantageous to Izlam.
This means that these folks are religiously bound to seek to dominate us, which usually turns out to mean our totally destruction, although in some cases Christians and Jews are allowed to live a life of very miserable second class citizenship under total muzlim domination. We can never be sure when they are lying to us, so that we can never ever trust them. This means that even the so-called moderate muzlims, the apparently peaceful muzlims that seem so nice, may still be simply lying in wait for the moment when it is opportune to rise up and strike us down. They can never be trusted because their religion instructs them to lie.
I recently got in trouble at the Cranmer blog site for making the same sort of comments that I have just made above. Cranmer himself described my comments as "odious" perhaps referring to my suggestion that in deporting muzlims they should not be given any payment other than the opportunity to continue to live. Cranmer went on to say, "Why so-and-so's grandfather was a muzlim" where so-and-so is apparently some well known person in British society. Well, that really makes no difference at all. We simply cannot tolerate people in our midst who have a religious obligation to dominate us and who are also obligated to lie whenever it is expedient to do so. We simply cannot work with such people. There is no honor code that we can use through which to relate to them.
We need to present this demand for total separation from muzlims over and over again, as often as possible to everyone we can. This is not an idea that is easy to sell, but there is no other solution to the problem. We cannot live with these people in our territory. They give us no way to co-exist with them. We must be separated unless we are willing to be subjugated.
Read the Koran, read their words, and tell me I'm wrong...
its only if u believe in the quran then u r wrong . else u can ignore it .. and quran does not give people right to kill their daughters.a reference would have been good.
we cannot judge islam by how some muslims are practicing to cover up their vain desires... i think its true for any set of beliefs..
thank u
Good morning all... too sleepy to respond other than to thank you for your comments and to say the United States must get out of the UN and must remove it from its location at Turtle Bay. Of course, we could keep an ambassador for the sake of keeping tabs on these folks but their recent resolution to condemn any criticism of Islam while there is no problem torturing and defaming Israel is curious as Islam is, to my understanding, a "nation" in and of itself with its own government, Sharia Law, designed to dominate the world. Hmmm...
Would someone please give me the url for Cranmer's blog? I went to the links but couldn't get the url. Sounds silly but true.
Thank you.
Cranmer is found at:
http://archbishop-cranmer.blogspot.com/
Muzlims Against Sharia is not to be trusted; they are still muzlims, and muzlims are required to lie. We must not be taken in by this stuff! It is a ruse to deceive the gullible. Only believe a muzlim after he tells you he has converted to Christianity and you see unequivocal proof that this conversion is true (not just words but much more than that; words could easily be just another lie). A muzlim that remains a muzlim is by definition a liar; there is no getting away from it. It is built in to the game.
From what I have seen in England and France, the Muslim eestablishment there does not encourage democracy but rather stresses staying within the "community" and taking over England at least. The huge mosque in Regency Park (?) I believe attests to the aim and the establishment of a government within a government.
The UN proclamations do everything to advance Islam in Western or soon to be formerly Western nations.
I am against violence toward Muslim men, women, and children who live peacefully within America, and certainly against violence against Hindus and others of Eastern religions, and being who I am, I want to believe that Muslims against Sharia are truthful but, from my reading, Sharia Law and the Koran are the same - Islam is, according to the great work done by Citizen Warrior, what I have come to see it as a simple weaving of all facets of life together under the blanket/law of Islam.
From what I have read, I cannot see how a Muslim can swear an oath to uphold our US Constitution without telling a lie as he works like so many far-leftists to undermine our nation.
Dr.D,
And whom are you gonna trust? these people? Without support of the West, radical Muslims would have no power. However, it is much easier to blame moderate Muslims and bunch them together with the radicals than admit your own fault.
Beach Girl,
“from my reading, Sharia Law and the Koran are the same”
Have you even read the Koran?
"Muslims Against Sharia is not to be trusted; they are still Muslims, and Muslims are required to lie. We must not be taken in by this stuff! It is a ruse to deceive the gullible."
Dr. D, I think Muslims Against Sharia are for real. They have rewritten the Koran, taking out all the 'bad' stuff. This will be considered major apostasy by the Islamofascists. They will be at the top of some Fatwa lists very soon if they aren't already. Imagine what will happen when they finally get the new book published. Check them out. Keep an eye on them, time will tell.
Hopefully this daughter-killing monkey will be caught and paraded before the cameras for all to see his ugliness and vile ideology.
absurd thought -
God of the Universe says
fathers may kill their daughters
if they feel dishonored
like when she dates the wrong boy
absurd thought -
God of the Universe says
allow religions to kill
believe its followers
when they claim to be peaceful
absurd thought -
God of the Universe says
never criticize prophets
there is no hateful scripture
claim it can't be translated
absurd thought -
God of the Universe thinks
ALL religions are GREAT
none are better than others
don't believe terrorists' threats
absurd thought -
God of the Universe says
threaten writers of books
telling the painful truths
hateful ideologies
http://haltterrorism.com/
.
Yes, I have read much of the Koran - not all of it but then I have not read the Holy Bible from cover to cover either. In terms of the Koran, I have read the English translation that seems to be the one approved for non-Arabic speakers.
Uspace, could you give me the reference to the Koran as re-written by Muslims against Sharia? I'll check out their site too. Thanks.
Hey Beach Girl, here you go:
http://muslimsagainstsharia.blogspot.com/
http://www.reformislam.org/koran.php
http://www.reformislam.org/verses.php
:)
At least on person who they have listed as Prominent Moderate Muslims has asked to be removed because they don't approve of rewriting the Koran, it seems to scare them to death.
I'm not surprised.
absurd thought -
God of the Universe says
threaten re-writers of books
telling the painful truths
removing hateful verses
http://haltterrorism.com/
.
:)
Thank you, Uspace. Please see comments left at my post, UK Blogger, Lionheart, may face imprisonment - comments with links left by Najistani.
I need a bit of help if you have time this morning. I need the links Najistani left sent to me as a comment with the actual urls and names of articles separate. If you have time, would you please just send them to me as urls, not links, than I can copy and post. I can do it but it will take me a lot time at the moment. If you are busy on a roll, I'll "get her done". Thank you.
I firmly believe that everything needs to be looked at through the lense of that culture. What is right in one setting is not in another. That being said there are a few absolute right and wrong situations. THERE IS NO REASON TO KILL YOUR CHILD REGARDLESS OF WHATEVER THEY HAVE DONE THAT YOU DISAGREE WITH!!!
And when will our Supreme Court say that "honor killings" are okay 'cause ya know, it's just a religious-cultural thang. Makes me sick.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home