CAIR and the Flying Imams - Discrimination or Conspiracy? Part 1

To get right to the crux of this post: The behavior of the flying imams is akin to yelling fire in a crowded theater, setting a fire and then daring anyone to use a fire extinguisher. Their behavior and the resulting lawsuits are most probably planned and perhaps our law enforcement officials should charge the flying imams, CAIR and all others involved in the planning and implementation of this plan with insighting terror and then applying lawsuits as extortion 1) for money to fund God knows what, and 2) for passenger silence through the imams superiority of being above the law. These tactics may work for folks such as – you now who – but a religion being used as a shield for terrorist-like behavior and passenger-intimidation – surely we have the legal minds to nip this method of “terrorism” in the bud, to stop this “jihad by lawsuit.” Tell me the difference in theory between this methodology to weaken our nation and the plotting of 6 Muslims to “hit Fort Dix” and kill soldiers. (search 6 Muslims plot to hit Fort Dix or in the Washington Times, articles by Jerry Seper) CAIR’s plan seems to be two-fold: 1) to stifle you and to leave you helpless through harassment suits and intimidation; in addition, 2) to elevate Muslim Imams and Muslims in general to special “above the secular law” status making them accountable only to Shari’a Law or Islamic Law while at the same time making us “submit” to Islam. (The Submission Train and here for more references.) Attaining this goal takes perseverance and a plan. Have you ever asked yourself why CAIR has or needs over 30 branches throughout the United States much like Mexican Consulates? Think about that and also ask yourself exactly what CAIR stands for – the Council on American-Islamic Relations. Sounds like an ombudsman group to me; a group liaison between two governments – the United States of America and the Islamic Caliphate. Think Bureau of Indian Affairs. All American Indian tribes are legal entities or separate nations unto themselves. Did you know that? They have rules and regulations – by treaty – that define their relationship with the United States of America. Is that how CAIR is establishing itself? When I have seen CAIR representatives on TV, they seem unctuous but arrogant with a superiority that is condescending at best, contemptuous at worst. CAIR’s arrogance and seemingly general contempt for the average American and especially American blacks is apparent in their methods. And their attitude of “speakers for all Muslims in America” demonstrates their demagoguery. Through made-up discrimination against the flying imams – not to be confused with the Flying Nun of years gone by who was good and wholesome or the Flying Walendas – the manner CAIR uses to increase membership and to become the voice of all Muslims in America is to set about “stirring up Muslims in America by appeals to emotion, prejudice, in order to win Muslims in America over quickly and so gain power.” I must refer you to Stop the Project and the avowed Twenty-year plan developed by the Muslim Brotherhood – a group founded in Egypt some 80 years ago or so – to infiltrate and take-over the United States of America for Islam. [Burn this into your brain – Islam is not just the “little church around the corner.” Islam – by the words of its leaders has a political policy arm. It is as much like a political party or a nationalistic movement as any “ism” you will ever encounter. To speak of this is not “hate speech”. If that were so, then Islamist leaders would themselves be guilty of “hate speech.” (site reference) Let’s get to CAIR’s PR and legal strategy regarding the 6 imams and their “self-initiated” case of discrimination at the airport on November 20, 2006. The internet is replete with references to the so-called flying imams. Here are a few sites of the many: A Passenger’s Right to Survive CAIR’s Strategy to win the 6 imams case: audio and transcripts upon which my anaysis is based. Laws must exist to curtail frivolous lawsuits and curtail an organization creating self-induced incidents designed to bring about the illusion of “discrimination” through intentional behavior and then turning around and suing for monetary gain. Laws must exist to curtail an organization engaging in planned harassment then hiding behind our system of laws. What are RICO statutes and can they be used when an organization or group seeks to extort another group, an individual, or a commercial entity? We as Americans must become aware of CAIR’s tactics and we must pursue all non-violent avenues open to us to alert our schools, to educate the public, and to alert our legislators to these tactics. The recent HRES 288 (give reference) is a perfect example of “greasing the skids” to set the stage for future legislation. Get the House Resolution through – easy to vote on because it is not “official law” and then slip in the law, such as HR 1592 on “hate crimes” (site several references here) which set the stage for future “thought crimes” that legislators and then law enforcement think they can infer from someone’s speech or writing. Big Brother isn’t busy enough it seems. In this war against Islamic terrorists, each American citizen has as “citizen’s responsibility” to make any authority aware of suspicious behavior by anyone boarding an airplane, taking extensive pictures of reservoirs, taking special interest in highway overpasses, bridges, skylines, electrical power generating dams, military bases such as Fort Dix, and the like. Keep in mind this “war” has been brought to us over the past 25 years at least. It is nothing new; it just that now we have acknowledged the war and our enemies. The flying imams and CAIR intend to intimidate and silence citizens just as they are doing in their support of HR 1592 – a great victory, thank you Rep. John Conyers – and HRES 288, and the defeat of HR 1640 protecting passengers. All efforts are designed to leave us personally defenseless and our tolerant nation paralyzed and to harass citizens from speaking or writing the truth, from being vigilant, from perhaps saving their own lives and the lives of fellow citizens. Let me interject here that American Muslims died horrendous deaths when the Twin Towers came down; so these Islamist terrorists will kill anyone; CAIR will go to any lengths to stifle, perhaps extort, intimidate, and eventually nag or badger us into “submission” in their attempt to become the spokesmen for all Muslims in America. Do not think CAIR is alone either. The Muslim Brotherhood is active behind the scenes with front organizations in this nation. The Islamists are becoming very adept at using our generosity and our laws of “equal protection” for 501c3 organizations and for “churches” to set up a massive network from innocuous Islamic Centers on or near college campuses to tax-exempt organizations to raise money for any manner of activities. As an aside, Barack Hussein Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham met Barack’s father and later his step-father at an East meets West center at a University in Hawaii. [Search Ann Obama for clarification] From there Barack spent his early-childhood in Indonesia. He could not have avoided training as a Muslim. My question: is he allowed to lie about his religious affiliation to advance the cause of Islam? Just curious. Muslims cannot leave the religion of peace, thereby putting a President Obama in great danger from Muslims as the Qur'an dictates the death of apostates. If Americans of all political persuasions need anymore verifiable proof that the Democrat-controlled Congress stands on the side of terrorists and/or terrorists sympathizers and supporters and against the American populace regardless of ethnicity, gender, age, religion – then the 237-180 vote that passed HR 1592, Local Law Enforcement…… should demonstrate that the Democrat Liberal Left’s hatred of George W. Bush and their appeasement to those Islamists terrorists whomever they are and under whatever guise they masquerade not only within the United States but throughout the world should be proof enough. The John Doe Motion HR 1640 to protect passengers who pointed out suspicious behavior to airplane crew from civil suit has been dropped. You are vulnerable, you are defenseless now against lawsuits filed by reprehensible men meaning to do you harm – the flying imams – who initiated behavior designed to intimidate and frighten passengers. [One or more of whom are fluent in Arabic or the language the imams were speaking.] When passengers responded as planned and anticipated by the imams – their behavior designed to solicit fear – the imams are now suing the airline company, the crew, and with Democrat support will be able to sue passengers – sheep to slaughter. The CAIR Town Hall Meeting is billed as a meeting on “airport profiling.” However, no profiling was involved in the flying imams’ self-generated incident. Profiling in and of itself can and should be applied by authorized police or governmental agencies; however, when one calls attention to oneself through extremist behavior, one should not be allowed to call “foul” when people act to defend themselves against a perceived threat. Imam or shaman or priest or snake worshiper – no one should be able to harass and intimidate and frighten passengers without repercussions and even criminal penalties being filed upon the respective imam, shaman, priest, or snake worshiper. To repeat: The behavior of the flying imams is akin to yelling fire in a crowded theater, setting a fire and then daring anyone to use a fire extinguisher. Their behavior and the resulting lawsuits are most probably planned and perhaps our law enforcement officials should charge the flying imams, CAIR and all others involved in the planning and implementation of this plan with insighting terror and then applying lawsuits as extortion 1) for money to fund God knows what, and 2) for passenger silence through the imams superiority of being above the law. These tactics may work for folks such as – you now who – but a religion being used as a shield for terrorist-like behavior and passenger-intimidation – surely we have the legal minds to nip this method of “terrorism” in the bud, to stop this “jihad by lawsuit.” Tell me the difference in theory between this methodology to weaken our nation and the plotting of 6 Muslims to “hit Fort Dix” and kill US soldiers. Which is "terror" and which is not? Next: Nihad Awad's call - we need more victims! Part 2 (or something close)