Break Clinton, the Lesser's, war chest!
Okay, this is a squirrley idea, I admit, but fun to contemplate... I must be experiencing low blood sugar. I have worked on several political campaigns. One item that campaigns will nearly "kill" for are mailing lists and as for getting names on their mailing lists, the more the better. All right, so 20 million innocent folks each send in $1.00 donations to help the campaign. That's 20 million dollars - not good. But do you know how much money candidates spend just on mailings to contact those 20 million people over and over and over again? Okay, $0.50. Too much? But what a reward... And you get the same mailings regardless of what you contribute. Oh, I know that Clinton, the Lesser, has a kazillion dollars in campaign donations but wouldn't it be fun to get your $1.00's worth of literature? Admittedly, the thought of being on the Lesser's list of donors is rather scary but a small sacrifice to "save" America, yes? Then there is the likeability factor. Read a good article in National Review on Clinton, the Lesser's likeability - not very likeable. Of all of the candidates - on both sides - who is the least likeable of them all? We know you wouldn't let Clinton, the First, drive your teenage daughter home even as lovable as he is and being a philanderer plus an aledged "abuser of women", but would you let Clinton, the Lesser, babysit your kids? [Not for the same reasons, obviously. Think Cinderella's step-mother or the Queen in "Snow White and the Seven Dwrafs"] Hmm... The gurus of the polls say that single women will vote for Clinton, the Lesser, just based on gender. Well, we'll see. I have to believe that women, even single women, know that all those millions of "new programs" Clinton has ideas for that we can't afford will be funded from someone's hard-earned salary. And all single women do not escape the "tax woman." Right... Where is Captain John Smith when we need him?