Wednesday, March 07, 2007

Deporting Illegal Aliens and States Rights

It seems that the news is all a buzz that the federal government is now having a few raids on businesses who have hired illegal aliens both contractors, state services in MO for an example, and some even working for federal contractors. The laws of 1986 have simply not been enforced and we have experienced +/- 1,000,000 new illegals annually plus our suicidal process of giving automatic citizenship to "anchor" babies - infants born to parents here illegally. A correct reading of the US Constitution would show that the amendment XIV dealing with citizenship/children born in America - the United States of America - "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside...." The key is "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" in that illegal aliens are foreign nationals and subject to the jurisdiction of their nations of birth. Whether we like it or not, Mr. Vicente Fox was quite vocal in that he had 25-45 million Mexican Nationals in the United States. These folks who will be given "amnesty" will also be able to have dual citizenship. Just two examples of how stupid we are: Joe Lieberman has Israeli citizenship as well as US citizenship yet he was acceptable as a candidate for the Vice Presidency. Another example of how we are being "milked", a friend of mine's daughter married a great young man from Peru. He is an American citizen and has given up his Peruvian citizenship. His father, however, is in the United States to get his citizenship; he is allowed to have dual citizenship with Peru and returns to vote in Peru where he also owns significant land. His plan is to live here long enough to earn Social Security and then return to Peru - to return here for medical care if he needs it and cannot get it in Peru. Pretty soon the only folks in the United States who don't have dual-citizenship with be folks born in the United States to parents also born to legal residents of the United States. What am I getting to? We should eliminate dual citizenship, period. Deny citizenship to "anchor" babies along with the denial of SSI and other freebees; And States should have full authority to protect their legal citizens and legal residents who are footing the bill for the illegal aliens. I know I'm on the losing side of this issue since the federal government has been turning a blind eye to the immigration laws since the 3,000,000 amnesty of 1986. NAFTA, CAFTA and all the AFTAs are designed to weaken our national sovereignty. To be fair, candidly, I must admit that the illegals or legal foreign national men in the building trades are hard workers who do excellent work which is admirable and of a high quality. These men - illegal or legal - the ones I have seen doing work in my area do have high standards of excellence in their work. These are not jobs that "Americans" won't take. It has to do with good business. Would you hire people to work for you who did shoddy work or would you hire folks whose work was consistently good? Sticky situation and I acknowledge that I am in the minority obviously with regard to maintaining our national sovereignty - certainly the federal government or the past three administrations have all been "new world order globalists" so the invasion of illegals and the implementation of the NAFTA, CAFTA, and the SPP along with the superhighway helps them meet their ends. Talk about divide and conquer - I still don't understand our government's clear desire to literally/physically divide and conquer the American people. Maybe I've viewing this incorrectly and need to take another look but as things are going... To which nation does/should the average middle-class citizen have loyalty? We are covering the costs of all illegals. What additional prices will we pay? Here, at home, as a result of the government's failure to uphold the US Constitution, defend against invasion, and as a result of prison programs that provide the opportunity for some to recruit potential terrorists? Working my way back to you - thank you for your patience.

2 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

You know, being a naturalized US citizen and being born in Scotland, I must say, from a personal standpoint, I have seen a lot of changes in our immigration laws.

My dad had to send for us only after he spent six months in the US to establish a job and he had to have a place already set up for us to move here. He also had to have a car. This was in 1970.

Things have drastically changed if you contrast 1970's immigration status to present time.

It also shows how much pandering and apologetic foolishness has overcome our government.

10:49 PM  
Blogger Beach Girl said...

Yes, and crippled us as a nation - no wonder we look ready for "take over" or is it a merger? Thanks, Steve.

8:35 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

  • International Civil Liberties Alliance
  • The Belmont Club
  • Gates of Vienna
  • The Blogmocracy
  • Larwyn's Linx at Director Blue
  • Boycott the New York Times -- Read the Real News at Larwyn's Linx
  • Conservative Blogs - Home Center Right
  • 100 Excellent Conservative blogs you should be reading
  • Antz in Pantz - Kickin' and Screamin'
  • Honor Killing in America - Never Forget
  • Sharia from European Court of the Rights of Man
  • Terrifying Brilliance of Islam
  • Triumph of Islam - How Primitive Tribalism Can Defeat Advanced Civilisation
  • Why is Islam so successful?
  • The Terrifying Brilliance of the Islamic Memeplex"
  • Three Things about Islam: Remember that the Quran is NOT the torah or the Bible
  • Links
  • Secure Freedom - NO Mosque at Ground Zero
  • Gates of Vienna - a MUST Read
  • Islam - The Religion of Peace
  • Muslim Domination of Public Space
  • Trencherbone