Homosexual marriage ordered by NJ Supreme Court

Who the hell died and made these black-robed tyrants god? What a twist! Supreme Court (appointed) in the states of NJ, MA, and Texas (with their recent sodomy good; heterosexual contact marginal ruling) are now dictating to "elected" legislators what bills they must write and pass. Supreme courts used to just say whether some bill was constitutional or not, in their "judgement". Legislators yawned. When did the state judiciary take control of state government? Next they'll be saying church bells can't ring once on Sundays because the melodious sounds wafting across the slumbering town interferes with the Islamist boys and girls hearing the call to prayers that screech out poluting the air waves in a foreign tongue - what? Five times a day interrupting the work and rest of the infidels. I do declare we've got so many "imperialisms" and "invaders" to deal with, how can we keep track: Islamic Imperialism, the Imperial Judiciary, the Mexican Re-conquistadors, and more. Mercy! Well, I've coined an acronym - can you do that? It is disgusting to me and along the lines of RINO but it is MINO (pronounced minnow) for Muslim in name only. As distasteful as the entire concept is you can "kill" a few birds at one time: MINOs would pay no taxes under Sharia Law; abortions would stop on a dime; but, we'd have a kazillion laws to memorize and follow (Sharia Law); homosexual marriage would not be an issue and you could forget about gay "rights"; the NOW gals wouldn't have to worry about the "glass ceiling" because they'd never see the blue sky much less the inside of a corporate headquarters building; company-raping lawyers would be out of work along with divorce lawyers - repudiation requires no lawyerly grubbing paws - welfare would probably decrease because the repudiated women would be "kicked" to the street, turn to prostitution, and yes - get stoned to death. You get the idea. Are our "state supreme courts" our Americanized version of the Mullahs of Mecca? Are they collectively our Ayatollahs (sp)? We elect members of the legislatures. Judges are appointed for life and presto-changeo, they become the diety - the bishops, etc., of the church of Secularism! For you legislation buffs out there, how many of these "dieties" have contradicted each other? No wonder we seem locked in a perpetual state of national schizophrenia without meds. Good grief! You want to give someone term limits, term-limit these judicial potentates. Wake up, America! (Earl Pitts) Sure wish I'd said that. Today, I'm in a fine humor enjoying the brisk autumn air, watching the glorious trees shedding their brilliant leaves as they prepare for the winds of winter, and sharing a few minutes with you. We can "take back the culture" as the Baron (Gates of Vienna says by keeping conservative Republicans in office and holding their feet to the fire. In Nov. 2008, they'll be up for re-election once more and this time there will be no President Bush for anyone to kick around or to blame. I suspect that if the Republicans keep control of the Congress (House and Senate) in 2006, their legislative agenda will change and become more conservative. Their re-elections in 2008 depend on it. As Americans, we have founding principles we cannot set on the shelf hoping they'll be there when we go to dust them off. You, I, we must fight for these principles to keep them breathing, bright, and alive. The less-extreme course we have is the ballot box. See you there, November 7th.