tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30462652.post506153770782527358..comments2023-10-19T06:11:54.243-04:00Comments on Conservative Beach Girl: Are "hate-crimes" laws unconstitutional?Beach Girlhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05210025685265415598noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30462652.post-56283553331695444492007-08-04T21:08:00.000-04:002007-08-04T21:08:00.000-04:00Welcome to the pack! Yes, as you described that w...Welcome to the pack! Yes, as you described that would qualify for unconstitutional.<BR/><BR/>Funny thing is the rich elites will be over-run when there is no longer a middle class to elect them or to buy their products.<BR/><BR/>I'll check out your post. If you have not introduced yourself over at The Gates of Vienna, please do so.<BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/" REL="nofollow">Gates of Vienna</A>Beach Girlhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05210025685265415598noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30462652.post-4935966694395826042007-08-04T11:55:00.000-04:002007-08-04T11:55:00.000-04:00Just getting acquainted! I'm new at the herd (see ...Just getting acquainted! I'm new at the herd (see bloggregator: The Lighthouse). Now are you? <BR/>In answer to your question, I'm from Eurabia, so I wouldn't know the finer points of US law. But according to Stephen Hicks of the Objctivist Center, the mechanics of the 'redistribution' of speech works the same as affirmative action. I.e. groups belonging to the white, Christian, rich, male litany are allowed less free speech and are given handicaps (hate speech issues) relative to weak minorities who are favoured. It's institutionalized inequality, evidently. Would that qualify for unconstitutional? See my post yesterday: http://millennium-notes.blogspot.com/2007/08/marxist-revival-4.htmlKassandra Troyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08807916829602751413noreply@blogger.com