Mitch McConnell; The 910 Group; and Know our enemy
Today, I want to be brief if that is possible for me and mention two notes of importance. First, Rush Limbaugh, hate him or love him, he knows the enemy and he so states that in his January 2007 first issue of the Limbaugh Letter. Mitch McConnell, the 910 Group, and Rush Limbaugh's Know our enemy are not related, certainly not directly. I do not want to imply that they are connected because they are not. That issue has two important articles. The first is "Know our enemy". I have only one quotation from that article and it sums up the work before the 910 Group and like-minded groups, including the Free Muslims. From Netanyahu: "When a world leader has openly called for geneocide, believe him." From Rush Limbaugh, "Knowing our enemy requires us to believe the evidence in front of our eyes. And we must understand, in our marrow, that defeating this enemy will take every last measure of strength God has given us." The enemy who has been attacking us (Western Civilization), aided by our liberal left in softening us up through political correctness (aka censorship) and now Conyers HR 288 as well as their denial, is and has been militant Islam. The goal is world domination and that means dominating YOU. Good news exists though in the Senate. If you thought the Senate worked like molasses going up hill in winter, just hang on for the fun during the next two years. Mitch McConnell - a really smart guy - is the Senate Minority Leader. He has a minority of 49 senators which means that he can have 8 vote with the Dhimmicrats and still keep legislation from getting anywhere. As Senator McConnell rightly points out, "In the Senate the things you prevent from happening are just as important as the things you accomplish." Yip, yip, yahoo! as Rush says. Remember too, that Senator McConnell has a greater minority than the Dhimmicrats had which means he can let more of the republicans vote to appease their constituents and still carry the day on the 60 vote thing the Dhimmicrats are so empowered by. Now to the 910 Group, many of us feel guilt or "shame" at having lives and not being able to "do" too much to help defeat the institutionalization of Sharia Law in our respective nations. Be of good cheer! Cast off that guilt or shame; shame and guilt are self-defeating and can paralyze you in your efforts. One letter to the editor, one letter to your Congressman, one letter to your Senator advances our cause of keeping our nations free, of keeping the lamp of Liberty bright. And recall that "gridlock" is a beautiful thing. Support your Congressmen and Senators who support Liberty and Freedom. withdraw support from those who wish to enslave us, who wish to destroy our freedoms, and who wish to appease an implacable foe.
5 Comments:
SO very well said, BG. I cannot expound more importance than you did in that we should all be writing letters to our lawmakers, expressing the importance that radical Islam is our number one enemy.
I am going to link your blog from mine. This one is a must-read. Thanks for posting this.
Thank you. Yes, I plan to help with the writing of letters, etc. No form letters, each must be personalized.
Beach Girl ~
Thank you for two things: a) writing this important post, which I have linked to a new one on my own blog and b) being a fellow optimist.
If you need help with copywriting for letters (or anything else), I'll be more than glad to work with you.
Let's give it to them!
Time to crank up my printer. I'll certainly send an email because it will be received earlier because of security measures with regard to snail-mails to Capitol Hill.
Just yesterday, I received via email a long letter which speaks to the topic here. I'll review it and likely post it.
Voltaire - thank you - yes, I may need some assistance in that area.
AOW - e-mail good; followed by snail-mail better as I understand it. Not sure on the numbers, but 1 snail mail equals MANY e-mails and MANY, MANY more folks who feel the same but don't take the time to write.
Otter, I'd ask Virgil Goode in VA; and then binding or non-binding, if it passes it sets a precedent and the public itself would not necessarily know the difference if HR 288 got publicity - this is PR and PsyOps combined so, to me, we can't rely on the public making the distinction if the publicity is robust. It is a perception thing as well.
Thank you for the great comments.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home