Interrogating Terrorists

If we could have interrogated a terrorist prior to 9/11 who would have given us information to have prevented the murders of 2,996 of our citizens, what exactly would have been the appropriate measures/techniques for our interrogators to have used? Answer that question and then tell me what you would tell the wives, husbands, sons, daughters who lost loved ones on 9/11 had you not used the methods. Would you say, "Well, we are civilized. Your husband died a horrible death because, well, ah, we, ah, didn't want to, ah, humiliate the terrorist in any way. You know, it would have been insulting had we used women interrogators. You know, that's humiliating in the terrorist's religion, you know, the ideology of peace." Sharia Law can work its way into our democratic republic in insidious ways. One is to weaken our resolve; to have us concerned more about the "feelings" of the terrorists than we are about the safety of our own men, women, and children. And who in their right minds doesn't think our soldiers would not be tortured and have not been tortured - Geneva Conventions or not. I remember the scenes of the bodies of our soldiers sodomized, tortured, and killed in Iraq. Or maybe Afghanistan. I hate to let the Senate in on this but the terrorists must be rolling in laughter at our gullibility and naivete. What exactly is the moral high ground in war? War is hell. It isn't fun; it isn't nice; and this one was brought to us.